Bijender v. State

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
V .;',BAlt APPLN. 1173/2017:' • . ^ ^ ^ '
V ;cBIJENDER , <; ; •/ ,,: ^ j Petitioner
> , , ; . Through Mr.. AtulK Sharma, Advocate, :
" Versus-' . • ' '
V < •
STATE ' ^ ^ ; Respondent;
Throiigh JV&..^MlFarc)oqui, APP^fo^^ . ASIHawa Singh, PS NihalVihar
'- ".:BAILAPjPL;N. 1174/2P17 - •
'' ANITA, v'••••:/ -Petitioner-/ y ^
. Through Mr. Atul.KShannia, Advocate /
-

^ •/ ;• • "
•
, \ STATE , • - Respondent
' ' ^Through- Mr. GM Farooqui, APP for State with.::
^ ^ ' -ASIHawa Singh, PS Nihal Vihar;
' .GORAM:.: -'y ..- v"':;
HON'BLE MR. JU^^ V-: ORDER - --V" .'v '
--^-y ,09.08.2()I7,- •;'-^i; :
: • In the .above-captioned Bailapplications, petitioner,Bijender is V, ^ . ; the husband and-petitioner Anita, is the wife. FIR is an outcome of
• : landiord-rtenant dispute between the/co-accused Kayka ,Sharma; .
. j(l^dlprd) anidvRelia Goyal (complainant As per I^IR,. the •
,. . ' - • , incident is alleged tohave taken place atabout40:15 AM atthe office .
, of/th6'complainant, to-accused Kavita Shamia.ialong, with her; sisterTin-iaw (deyrani)^forcibly entered in the:tenanted premises, and
2017:DHC:8451 . ' v\; tried^to
• them. -
' the' petitioners,and!con^ documents arejjet to; be
- ' recovered-from the petitio / • > , - •. ~ ' :
- '' have already joined the investigation, and. are not retjuired for any.-
>; ,further investigation^ Also, nothing, is, to be.recovered ,fi'om^ thern, , ^ ' therefore, the petitioners fegfanted anticipatory baU.. ;; ;• . , -
„ r;! 0 , Keeping, in mind ,the, to^ity- of facts ^d drcurnstances as , . ^
V: • detailed herein^oye,rit is-01^ that mcas^:ofimest^petitioners be •
' ^ rf>lp^QP/l on'flritldnatorv.haU subieet to their furnishing,personal bonds^ -
V releasedon
• in the sum
,bne
' v!' -V Officeb(Arresting Qfficer/SHO concerned., • ; , ./ ; ^
. ; ',^ ^Bailipplicatipris are disposed pbnthe abbye tem^^ •
V' •^6uST09/2017;-. } ^
• ' - - A
' ' •• I ' \ '
' i
\. •
A.K. PXTHAK, J
• ' /
•' /' V ;
2017:DHC:8451