Crime Investigation Detective Trust v. Delhi Development Authority

Delhi High Court · 06 Sep 2017 · 2017:DHC:5161-DB
Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar
W.P.(C)No.6728/2016
2017:DHC:5161-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging authorized parking along roads in front of certain plots at Jasola District Centre, holding that such parking was lawful based on official authorization.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C)No.6728/2016 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(C)No.6728/2016
Date of Decision: 6th September, 2017 CRIME INVESTIGATION
DETECTIVE TRUST ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Krishna K. Singh, Adv.
VERSUS
DELHI DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY AND ORS ... Respondents
Through : Mr. Nikhil Goel and Mr. Ashutosh Ghade, Advs. for
DDA.
Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv. for SDMC/R-2 with Mr. Anil Verma, Head Clerk, SDMC.
Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC for R-3 & 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

1. The petitioner had complained that illegal parking in and around Jasola District and the road along TDI centre had developed which is run and controlled by parking mafia. In this regard, our attention is 2017:DHC:5161-DB drawn to the counter affidavit filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation setting out the details of authorized parking sites under their control. The SDMC has disclosed existence of authorized parking at the following three spots: S.No. Parking Area Possession Company to which Possession is Granted Date of Possession Remarks

1. Jasola District Center Plot No.3,7,[8] & 9 YES Shri Dharmender 28.4.2016 Authorised Parking

2. Mohan Cooperative YES M.S. Contractor 16.3.2017 Authorised Parking

3. Non- Hierarchical Commercial Center, Jasola YES Deepika Associates 21.12.2016 Authorised Parking

2. Ld. counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no parking permissible on the plot nos.3, 7, 8, 9, Jasola District Centre. It is submitted by ld. counsel for the SDMC that reference to the plot, so far as the parking site is concerned, is to enable the identification. In fact, the parking is along the road in front of these plots where authorized parking has been permitted. This fact is confirmed by the respondent nos.[3] and 4 in their counter affidavit dated 28th September, 2016 which have to be read along with the enclosed documents. It is also manifested from the allotment letter dated 25th April, 2016 “regarding parking site in front of Plot No.3 and in front of Plot No.7, 8 & 9, Distt. Centre Jasola” addressed by the Delhi Development Authority to the AE/Survey, DDA, Vikas Sadan, INA, New Delhi- 110023 with copies addressed to the allottees.

3. In view of the above, the necessary clarifications have been provided and this writ petition need not detain us any further.

4. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2017 aj