Full Text
W.P.(CRL) 1070/2017
DEEPANSHU ARORA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Nitin Ahlawat, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
Through: Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI
Narender, PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi.
Mr.Ashish Ruhella, Advocate with Mr.Rohit Tyagi, Advocate for R-2 to R-6 along with respondent no. 2 to 6 in person.
JUDGMENT
1. Status report has been filed.
2. Respondent No.2 to 6 are present. They are being represented by their counsel. They are duly identified by the IO SI Narender.
3. The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “Cr.P.C.”) for quashing of the FIR bearing No. 1627/2015, registered 2017:DHC:5219 against them on 23.12.2015 with Police Station Prashant Vihar, (Outer District), Delhi under Sections 354/323/341/509/506/34 IPC on the complaint of respondent No.2.
4. Respondent no. 2 is the father-in-law of the petitioner, respondent no. 3 is the wife of petitioner, respondent no. 4 is the brother-in-law of the petitioner, respondent no.5 is the brother of respondent no. 2 and the petitioner no. 6 is the sister of respondent no. 2.
5. It is submitted that there was an altercation between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 to 6 on 22.12.2015 as there was a matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the respondent no. 3.
6. The parties to the petition have already settled and resolved all their disputes on 10.05.2016 through a Compromise Deed, copy of which has been placed on record.
7. As per the terms and conditions of the settlement, the petitioner had agreed to pay a total sum of Rs.1,75,00,000/- to the respondent no. 3 in full and final settlement of her all claims.
8. Pursuant to the settlement, at the time of granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner, he has paid a sum of Rs.60,00,000/- to the respondent no. 3.
9. The respondent no. 2 to 6 submit that they do not want to pursue the said FIR. They submit that the said FIR may be quashed.
10. Learned ASC through the IO submits that the charge sheet has so far not been filed.
11. Both the parties submit that now nothing is due and recoverable by them against each other. The matter had been amicably settled between the parties and no fruitful purpose would be served in further pursuing the said FIR. Hence, to secure ends of justice, the FIR bearing No. 1627/2015, registered on 23.12.2015 with Police Station Prashant Vihar, (Outer District), Delhi under Sections 354/323/341/509/506/34 IPC and proceedings arising out of the said FIR are hereby quashed.
12. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
13.