Union of India and Ors v. Rashmi Sinha

Delhi High Court · 08 Aug 2025 · 2025:DHC:5882-DB
Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain
W.P.(C) 10440/2025
2025:DHC:5882-DB
procedural other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to correct its earlier judgment by recording the appearance of the petitioners' counsel through a corrigendum.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10440/2025
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Ashish K. Dixit, CGSC, Mr.Shivam Tiwari, Mr.Umar
Hashmi, Advs.
VERSUS
RASHMI SINHA .....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R 08.08.2025
CM APPL. 48624/2025
JUDGMENT

1. By this application, the learned counsel for the petitioners states that his appearance has not been recorded in the Judgment dated 22.07.2025.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants, the application is allowed.

3. The appearance of Mr.Ashish K. Dixit, the learned counsel, shall be duly reflected for the petitioners in the Judgment dated 22.07.2025.

4. The application is disposed of.

5. This order shall be uploaded as a Corrigendum to the Judgment dated 22.07.2025.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 8, 2025/Arya/DG