Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LPA 507/2015 & CMs 13870-71/15,21671/15
LPA 507/2015 & CMs 13870-71/15,21671/15
W.P.(C) 5321/2015
W.P.(C) 5835/2015 & CM 26224/15
(i) & (ii) WELFARE OF ASSOCIATiON OF RESIDENTS OF RAJPUR
KHURD EXTENSION & ORS (iii) RAJNISH KUMAR AND ORS.
Appellants/Petitioners
Through: Mr. N.S. Dalai, Mr. Ramesh Kumar and Ms. Toral Banerjee, Advocates
(i) & (ii) WELFARE OF ASSOCIATiON OF RESIDENTS OF RAJPUR
KHURD EXTENSION & ORS (iii) RAJNISH KUMAR AND ORS.
Appellants/Petitioners
Through: Mr. N.S. Dalai, Mr. Ramesh Kumar and Ms. Toral Banerjee, Advocates
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELFH & ORS .....Respondents ' Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC with Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advocate for respondent^GNCTD initemNo.9
Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC Counsel (Civil) with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocate for respondent-GNCTD in item No.10.
Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr. Sachin Saini and Ms. Divyani Sehgal, Advocates for GNCTD in item No. 11
Ms. Ruchi Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.4 in item No.9
Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC Counsel (Civil) with Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advocate for respondent-GNCTD in item No.10.
Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC (Civil) with Mr. Sachin Saini and Ms. Divyani Sehgal, Advocates for GNCTD in item No. 11
Ms. Ruchi Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.4 in item No.9
CORAM;
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
14.09.2017 We have heard learned counsel for the parties and are of the opinion that in view of the fact that demolition action has been taken in respect of part of Khasra No.171, further intervention of the Court is not
Page 1 of2 2017:DHC:8680-DB V7 .--lie:;:c:r'" statement by learned counsel f onounced mview ofthe
Piviiremedies ^ counsel for appellants/petitioner howeverseeks libertl t
The Court is ofthe opinion that th^ r-i, ^ civil court should begranted AccoMingly ut petitioners to seeic their normal • •, appellants/ competentcoutt. At tIT "
W ftaher - . notice in thatregard. Ifasuitorany simil
« ~ - The appeal and the SEPTEa«BER14,2017 S. RAVINDRA bhat
(JUDGE)
GAIW
(JUDGE)
Page2of2 2017:DHC:8680-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
14.09.2017 We have heard learned counsel for the parties and are of the opinion that in view of the fact that demolition action has been taken in respect of part of Khasra No.171, further intervention of the Court is not
Page 1 of2 2017:DHC:8680-DB V7 .--lie:;:c:r'" statement by learned counsel f onounced mview ofthe
Piviiremedies ^ counsel for appellants/petitioner howeverseeks libertl t
The Court is ofthe opinion that th^ r-i, ^ civil court should begranted AccoMingly ut petitioners to seeic their normal • •, appellants/ competentcoutt. At tIT "
W ftaher - . notice in thatregard. Ifasuitorany simil
« ~ - The appeal and the SEPTEa«BER14,2017 S. RAVINDRA bhat
(JUDGE)
GAIW
(JUDGE)
Page2of2 2017:DHC:8680-DB
JUDGMENT