Full Text
Translation output
$-.55 & 63 HIGH COURT OF DELHI CRL.M.C. 3954/20 17
RAM KUMAR VIMAL & ANR Petitioners
Through Ms. Manisha and Arreen, Advocates
RAM KUMAR VIMAL & ANR Petitioners
Through Ms. Manisha and Arreen, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar
CRL.M.C. 395 8/2017 JATIN JAI SINGH Petitioner
Through Mr. Shahid Au, Advocate
Through Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for State SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar
CRL.M.C. 395 8/2017 JATIN JAI SINGH Petitioner
Through Mr. Shahid Au, Advocate
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through Mr. G M Farooqui, APP for State SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar
Ms. Manisha , Adv for R-2
Through Mr. G M Farooqui, APP for State SI Amit Dutt, PS Lajpat Nagar
Ms. Manisha , Adv for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
22.09.2017 By these petitions the petitioners have prayed for quashing of following cross FIRs:-
(a)FIR No. 177/2014 under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of respondent no.2 Ponam Vimal in Cr1. MC 3954/2017.; &
(b)FIR No. 178/2014 under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of respondent no.2 Dipali Jai Singh in Cr1. MC 3958/20 17.
2017:DHC:8071 ? Petitioners and respondents are known to each other, in as much as they are living in the same locality. A perusal of the FIRs show that a quarrel ensued between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of the aforementioned FIRs. Respondents / complainants namely Poonam
Vimal and Deepali Jai Singh are present in the Court and have been identified by ASI Jai Chand, PS Lajpat Nagar. Respondents submit that they have settled the matter with the petitioners of their own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. They further submit that they are not willing to pursue criminal proceedings against the petitioners and, therefore, aforementioned FIRs and consequent proceedings emanating thereform, may be quashed.
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondents, in the interest of justice, FIR Nos.177/2014 and 178/20 14 both under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. THAK, J SEPTEMBER 229 2017 sm 1.
2017:DHC:8071
22.09.2017 By these petitions the petitioners have prayed for quashing of following cross FIRs:-
(a)FIR No. 177/2014 under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of respondent no.2 Ponam Vimal in Cr1. MC 3954/2017.; &
(b)FIR No. 178/2014 under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar on the complaint of respondent no.2 Dipali Jai Singh in Cr1. MC 3958/20 17.
2017:DHC:8071 ? Petitioners and respondents are known to each other, in as much as they are living in the same locality. A perusal of the FIRs show that a quarrel ensued between them on some trivial issue which led to registration of the aforementioned FIRs. Respondents / complainants namely Poonam
Vimal and Deepali Jai Singh are present in the Court and have been identified by ASI Jai Chand, PS Lajpat Nagar. Respondents submit that they have settled the matter with the petitioners of their own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. They further submit that they are not willing to pursue criminal proceedings against the petitioners and, therefore, aforementioned FIRs and consequent proceedings emanating thereform, may be quashed.
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondents, in the interest of justice, FIR Nos.177/2014 and 178/20 14 both under Sections 323/324/354/506/34 IPC registered at PS Lajpat Nagar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. THAK, J SEPTEMBER 229 2017 sm 1.
2017:DHC:8071
JUDGMENT