Puneet Kumar v. State & Ors

Delhi High Court · 19 Sep 2017 · 2017:DHC:8294
Vinod Goel
W.P.(CRL) 2683/2017
2017:DHC:8294
criminal petition_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the criminal petitions as withdrawn but granted liberty to the petitioners to raise their contentions before the trial court at the charge framing stage.

Full Text
Translation output
$38 & 39 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL) 2683/20 17
PUNEET KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS Respondents
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with
SI Vijay Kumar, PS Farsh Bazar, Delhi. p W.P.(CRL) 2724/20 17
SHIV CHARAN SINGH & ORS Petitioners
Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE & ORS Respondents
Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State with
SI Vijay Kumar, PS Farsh Bazar, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
19.09.2017 Learned senior counsel, on instruction, submits that he does not press this petition. He submits that liberty may be granted to raise the points before the learned trial court at the time of considering the point of charge.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty as prayed.
VINOD GOEL, J.
SEPTEMBER 199 2017 "sandeep" 2017:DHC:8294
JUDGMENT