Khagesh B. Jha v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2017 · 2017:DHC:6002-DB
Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar
W.P.(C)No.8870/2017
2017:DHC:6002-DB
constitutional other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging circulars restricting parental rights in School Management Committees, directing the respondents to consider the petition as a representation and decide within eight weeks.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C)No.8870/2017 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(C)No.8870/2017
Date of Decision: 10th October, 2017 JUSTICE FOR ALL ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Adv.
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Ramesh Singh, SC- GNCTD with Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv.
Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC- NDMC for R-2 with Ms. Anushruti and
Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar, Advs. Ms. Monika Arora, SC-SDMC with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Adv.
Mr. U.P. Singh for Mr. D.K.
Devesh, Adv. for R-4/EDMC Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for
R-5/NDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
2017:DHC:6002-DB GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

1. This writ petition complains that by virtue of circulars dated 6th November, 2015 and 1st August, 2016, the respondents have restricted the rights of the School Management Committees (SMCs) in violation of the spirit, intendment and purpose of Section 21 of the Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 as well as Rules 3, 4 and 5 of the Delhi Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011. The petitioner makes a grievance that as a result of the circulars issued by the respondent no.1, involvement of parents as members of the School Management Committee have been abrogated impacting the involvement of the parents of the school children in the management and running of the schools.

2. We find that the petitioner has approached this court without having made any representation to the respondent no.1 which deserves to consider the grievance of the petitioner and to take a considered view thereon.

3. In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

(i) The respondent nos. 1 and 6 shall consider this writ petition as a representation and take a considered view thereon within eight weeks from today.

(ii) The decision taken by the respondent nos. 1 and 6 shall be communicated to the petitioner.

4. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J OCTOBER 10, 2017