Full Text
Translation output
$2 1.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(C.) 54/20 17 SANJEEV JAIN Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.K. Dhingra proxy advocate for Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(C.) 54/20 17 SANJEEV JAIN Petitioner
Through: Mr. M.K. Dhingra proxy advocate for Mr. S.C. Singhal, Adv.
VERSUS
MALLU RAM JAKHAR Respondent
Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Adv. Mr. Amit Kr. Singh and
Mr. Tarunesh Kumar, Advs.
Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Adv. Mr. Amit Kr. Singh and
Mr. Tarunesh Kumar, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
12.10.2017 Transfer, in exercise of powers under Section 24 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is sought of CS No.517406/2016 and Counter
Claim No.3/2016 therein and pending in the Court of Shri Vijay Shankar, Additional District Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi to this Court on the ground of Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate, son of the respondent practising in the
District Courts, having beaten up the petitioner when he appeared in the suit in the Dwarka Courts.
Notice of the petition was ordered to be issued and the counsel for the respondent appears.
The counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner feels more safe in appearing in this Court rather than in the Dwarka Courts.
No transfer on this ground can be permitted. The counsel for the respondent has stated that the petitioner is facing prosecution in five other cases in Dwarka Courts. Though the counsel for the respondent denies the
12.10.2017 Transfer, in exercise of powers under Section 24 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is sought of CS No.517406/2016 and Counter
Claim No.3/2016 therein and pending in the Court of Shri Vijay Shankar, Additional District Judge, Dwarka Courts, Delhi to this Court on the ground of Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate, son of the respondent practising in the
District Courts, having beaten up the petitioner when he appeared in the suit in the Dwarka Courts.
Notice of the petition was ordered to be issued and the counsel for the respondent appears.
The counsel for the petitioner has stated that the petitioner feels more safe in appearing in this Court rather than in the Dwarka Courts.
No transfer on this ground can be permitted. The counsel for the respondent has stated that the petitioner is facing prosecution in five other cases in Dwarka Courts. Though the counsel for the respondent denies the
TR.P.(C.) 54/2017 page lof 2
2017:DHC:8571 averments on which transfer is sought but on enquiry, it is informed that Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate is present in Court. Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate on enquiry states that he practices in all District Courts as well as in this
Court and on my request has assured that no untoward incident attributable to him shall happen qua the petitioner.
I have no reason to not believe the said assurance of an Advocate of this Court.
The petition is dismissed.
2017:DHC:8571 averments on which transfer is sought but on enquiry, it is informed that Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate is present in Court. Mr. Deepak Jakhar, Advocate on enquiry states that he practices in all District Courts as well as in this
Court and on my request has assured that no untoward incident attributable to him shall happen qua the petitioner.
I have no reason to not believe the said assurance of an Advocate of this Court.
The petition is dismissed.
ORDER
7. No costs.
OCTOBER 12, 2017 'pp'.. TR.P.(C.) 54/2017 IA! ENDLAW, J page2of[2] I 2017:DHC:8571