Ravinder Singh v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Delhi High Court · 30 Oct 2017 · 2017:DHC:6445
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
CRL.M.C. 930/2017
2017:DHC:6445
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court corrected an inadvertent omission of the CBI advocate's name in the appearance column of its order dated 30.10.2017.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 849/2017
BIRENDER SINGH YADAV .....Petitioner
VERSUS
C B I ....Respondent
CRL.M.C. 930/2017
RAVINDER SINGH ....Petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
CRL.M.C. 934/2017
SUSHIL KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
CRL.M.C. 935/2017
MUKESH KUMAR ....Petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ....Respondent
Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for CBI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R
30.10.2017 Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Counsel for the CBI has mentioned the matter on the ground that in the order dated 30.10.2017, at various places it is mentioned that he represents the CBI, however inadvertently in the appearance column his name has not been mentioned.
2017:DHC:6445 Heard Appearance of order dated 30.10.2017 be read as under :-
"Present: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Tiwari, Mr.Anil Kumar, Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocates for the petitioner with petitioner in person in Crl.M.C. No.849/2017.
Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K. Mittal & Ms. Rachna Maheshwari, Advocates for the petitioner in Crl.M.C.
Nos.930/2017, 934/2017 & 935/2017.
Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate for the CBI." SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
OCTOBER 30, 2017 2017:DHC:6445
JUDGMENT