New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Renu Devi & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 21 Nov 2017 · 2017:DHC:7135
R. K. Gauba
MAC App. No.681/2012
2017:DHC:7135
motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation applying the principle of res ipsa loquitur to infer negligence in a motor accident claim despite absence of direct eyewitness evidence.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC App. No.681/2012 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 21st November, 2017
MAC.APP. 681/2012 and CM APPL.11029/2012
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate.
VERSUS
RENU DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. By judgment dated 29.03.2012, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal decided the claim case (MAC Petition No. 1231/10) of the first to third respondents (collectively, the claimants) awarding compensation in their favour on account of death of Ganesh Singh in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 12.08.2010 statedly due to negligent driving of truck bearing registration No. UP-15C-3553 which was admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant (the insurer) for the relevant period. The appeal of the insurer is pressed only on the ground that negligence was not properly proved by eye-witness account.

2. Having heard the learned counsel and having gone through the record, this Court is of the opinion that the Tribunal’s judgment on the issue does not call for any interference. The Tribunal has gone by the principle of the res ipsa loquitor, taking into account the 2017:DHC:7135 MAC App. No.681/2012 circumstances surrounding the sequence of events leading to the fatal accident.

3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

4. By order dated 06.07.2012, the appellant had been directed to deposit the entire awarded amount and by subsequent order dated 26.04.2013, 50% of the awarded amount was released in favour of the claimants. The Registry shall now take steps to release the balance lying in deposit with accrued interest in terms of the judgment of the Tribunal.

5. The statutory amount shall be refunded.

6. The pending application also stands disposed of. R.K.GAUBA, J. NOVEMBER 21, 2017 srb