Nitish Srivastava v. Ajay Srivastava & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 23 Nov 2017
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
CS(OS) 193/2012
2017:DHC:8574
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the transfer petition as withdrawn and directed the civil suit to proceed with trial and evidence recording before the Joint Registrar.

Full Text
Translation output
$-27 & 2 (transferpetition)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(OS) 193/2012
NITISH SRIVASTAVA Plaintiff
Through Mr. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate
VERSUS
AJAY SRIVASTAVA &ORS Defendants
Through Ms. Manjit Kaur, proxy counsel for Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for defendant no.l with defendant no.l in person
, Mr. Jai Mohan, Advocate for
•p defendantNo.3
TR.P(C) 149/2017
NITISH SHRIVASTAVA Petitioner
Through Mr. Gurmeet Bindra, Advocate
VERSUS
AJAY SHRIVASTAVA &ORS Respondents
Through Ms. Manjit Kaur, proxy counsel for Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for defendant no.l with defendant no.l in person
Mr. Jai Mohan, Advocate for ^ defendant No.3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
ORDER o/o 23.11.2017
JUDGMENT

1. The counsel for the plaintiffin the suit and the petitioner mthe transfer petition withdraws the transfer petition.

2. TR.P.(C) 149/2017 is dismissed as withdrawn. CS(OS) 193/2012&TRPNo. 149/2017 Iof[2] 2017:DHC:8574

3. The counsel for the defendants on enquiry states that as far as the suit is concerned, the defendants have to lead evidence and the evidence is being recorded before the learned JointRegistrar.

4. List the matter before the Joint Resistor on 11^ December, 2017 for fixing dates oftrial.

NOVEMBER 23, 2017 mw CS(OS) 193/2012& TRPNo. 149/2017 RAJIV SAHAIENDLAW, J Page 2 of[2]