Full Text
W.P.(C) 10603/2017 &CM APPL. Nos.43420-421/2017
SANJEETYADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Pallav Kumar, Adv.
Through; Ms. Archana Gaur aiid Ms.Ridhima Gaur, Advocate.
NILESH KUMAR SAINI Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pallav Kumar, Adv.
Through: Ms. Archana Gaur and Ms.Ridhima Gaur, Advocate.
MUKESHKUMAR Petitioner
Through: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate.
DEVENDER KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate.
ABHISHEK Petitioner
Through: Mr, PallavKumar, Adv.
Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate.
2017:DHC:8633-DB
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
ORDER o/o 30.11.2017
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly states that he does not wish to press the present petitions in light ofthe view expressed by this Bench in two earlier petitions seeking the same relief, i.e. W.P.(C) No.10507/2017 and W.P.(C) No.10509/2017 that were dismissed vide order dated 27.11.2017.
2. We may note that the aforesaid two petitions were dismissed by holding that the petitioners therein having failed to lodge any protest with the respondent No.2/BSF on the date ofthe examination itself or within a reasonable time therefrom with regard to their grievance that they were not permitted to use their own key-board and mouse in the examination, their clairns were highly belated and could not beentertained.
3. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as not pressed along with the pending applications.