Jagpreet Singh v. New India Assurance Company Limited

Delhi High Court · 01 Dec 2017 · 2017:DHC:7451
R. K. Gauba
MAC App. No.1104/2012
2017:DHC:7451
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the claimant's appeal seeking enhancement of compensation awarded for injuries sustained in a motor accident, upholding the insurer's liability and the tribunal's compensation amount.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC App. No.1104/2012 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 1st December, 2017 MAC. APPEAL No.1104/2012
JAGPREET SINGH & ORS. ..... Appellants
Through: Nemo.
VERSUS
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS.
.….Respondents
Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. The appellant was the claimant before the tribunal in a motor accident claim case (Suit No.883/06/08) instituted on 19.12.2006, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 15.06.2006 due to negligent driving of tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LC-8847, which was insured against third party risk for the period in question with the first respondent (insurer). The tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 19.11.2010, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.1,46,600/- in his favour, holding tempo driver responsible fastening the liability to pay on the insurer. 2017:DHC:7451

2. The insurer came up with appeal (MAC APP.346/2011) challenging the aforesaid judgment on the ground of recovery rights. During the course of the said appeal, the claimant filed cross objections (CM No.23650/2011) on the basis of which the present appeal was registered. It may be added that the appeal of the insurer was dismissed by judgment dated 11.12.2012, but the present appeal (on cross objections) seeking enhancement of compensation survived.

3. The appeal was put in the list of ‘Regulars’ to come up on its own turn, as per order dated 10.02.2016. When it is called out for hearing, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant/claimant. The learned counsel for the insurer has been heard and with his assistance record perused.

4. The compensation awarded to the claimant was calculated by the tribunal, thus:-

┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Sl.No.                            Head                             Amount             │
│                                                                     (in Rs.)          │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│      1.      Pain and suffering                                        80,000/-       │
│      2.      Loss of amenities                                         30,000/-       │
│      3.      Special diet                                              10,000/-       │
│      4.      Conveyance                                                 5,000/-       │
│      5.      For medicines                                              5,000/-       │
│      6.      For loss of earning for two months @ Rs.8300/-            16,600/-       │
│                                                       Total         1,46,600/-        │
│           MAC App. No.1104/2012                               Page 2 of 3             │
│                                                                       2017:DHC:7451   │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

7. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. R.K.GAUBA, J. DECEMBER 01, 2017 vk