Regen Powertech Private Limited v. Sembcorp Green Infra Limited & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 13 Dec 2017 · 2017:DHC:7796-DB
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar
FAO(OS) Nos. 312-315/2017
2017:DHC:7796-DB
civil appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court set aside the summary dismissal of interim relief petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration on merits.

Full Text
Translation output
FAO(OS)Nos312-317/2017 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 13th December, 2017
FAO(OS) 312/2017, CAV No.1067/2017 & CM Nos.45193-
94/2017 REGEN POWERTECH PRIVATE LIMITED..... Appellant
Through : Mr. Anush Raajan, Adv.
VERSUS
SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shankh Sengupta, Ms. Tine Abraham and Ms. Vatsala Kumar, Advs.
FAO(OS) 313/2017, CAV No.1066/2017 & CM Nos.45195-
96/2017
VERSUS
SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMTED &ORS ..... Respondents
2017:DHC:7796-DB
FAO(OS) 314/2017, CAV No.1069/2017 & CM Nos.45245-
46/2017
VERSUS
GREEN INFRA WIND FARM ASSETS LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents
FAO(OS) 315/2017, CAV No.1070/2017 & CM Nos.45250-
51/2007
VERSUS
GREEN INFRA WIND ENERGY ASSETS LIMITED & ANR ..... Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE CAV No.1067/2017 in FAO(OS) 312/2017;
CAV No.1066/2017in FAO(OS) 313/2017;
CAV No.1069/2017 in FAO(OS) 314/2017; and CAV No.1070/2017 in FAO(OS) 315/2017

1. Caveators are represented and have been heard.

2. The caveats are discharged. CM Nos.45193-94/2017 in FAO(OS) 312/2017; CM Nos.45195-96/2017 in FAO(OS) 313/2017; CM Nos.45245-46/2017 in FAO(OS) 314/2017; and CM Nos.45250-51/2017 in FAO(OS) 315/2017 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The applications are disposed of. FAO(OS)Nos.312-315/2017

1. These appeals assail the order dated 27th November, 2017 whereby the ld. Single Judge has dismissed the OMP(I)Nos.26/2017; 27/2017; 22/2017 and 23/2017 filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the very first date itself without calling for replies from the respondents.

2. Both the parties have placed reliance on several judicial precedents in support of the rival contentions. It would appear that no finding has been recorded prima facie on the factual submissions made by the appellant nor was reply called for from the respondents.

3. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, ld. Senior Counsel appearing for respondents, who are caveators before us, on instructions submits that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respondents, the impugned order dated 27th November, 2017 may be set aside and the matter be remanded back for consideration afresh.

4. With the consent of the parties, the impugned order dated 27th November, 2017 is hereby set aside and quashed. The matter is remanded back for consideration afresh on merits by the ld. Single Judge.

5. The parties shall appear before the ld. Single Judge on 14th December, 2017 for further directions in the matter.

6. It is made clear that nothing herein contained is an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. The appeals are disposed of in the above terms. Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR, J DECEMBER 13, 2017 mk