Sal Ram Traders v. Commissioner of VAT & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 18 Dec 2017 · 2017:DHC:8649-DB
Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh
W.P.(C) 9789/2017
2017:DHC:8649-DB
tax petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging non-payment of interest on VAT refunds, holding that such grievances must be pursued through appropriate legal remedies after refund orders are passed.

Full Text
Translation output
$-13 to 16 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 9789/2017
SAL RAM TRADERS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through None (t
W.P.(C) 9790/2017 e
S.S ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner
• . Through Mr. M.A. Ansari Khursheed Ahmad, Advocate
VERSUS
Through Mr. Avtar Singh, Advocate.
W.P.(C) 10017/2017 e
SAPTHA GIRL ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Advocate e
VERSUS
,.. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through None
W.P.(C) 10039/2017
VINOD TRADING COMPANY ..... Petitioner Advocate i
2017:DHC:8649-DB
VERSUS
Through Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIVKHANNA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
0/0 18.12.2017 It is stated by the counsel for the parties that refunds have been processed and orders have been passed. The petitioners,Jf aggrieved
",. ~~\-CM..d4' t': ....:;... by an order for non-payment of interestt-are at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.
In view of the statement and in terms of the aforesaid observation, the writ petitions are disposed of.
~-·llL- SANJIV KHANNA, J. p~~r.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
DECEMBER 18, 2017 mw/mr \ 2017:DHC:8649-DB
JUDGMENT