Full Text
Translation output
$-14 to 17 HIGH COURT OF DELHI . BAIL APPLN. 1919/2017
ROHITRANA
Petitioner
Through: Mr. Girish Kumar, Advocate.
ROHITRANA
Petitioner
Through: Mr. Girish Kumar, Advocate.
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with W/SI. Neetu, P.S. K.N.K. Marg.
BAIL APPLN; 1920/2017 RAVI RANA
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State with W/SI. Neetu, P.S. K.N.K. Marg.
BAIL APPLN; 1920/2017 RAVI RANA
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI..... Respondent
BAIL APPLN. 1927/2017
NIKHIL CHAUDHARY
NIKHIL CHAUDHARY
VERSUS
, THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent 2017:DHC:8794
^ • u, • • - .'I'.'• • . " L • •• • • • • , • . .
^ • u, • • - .'I'.'• • . " L • •• • • • • , • . .
SBAIL APPLN. 1928/2017
RAKESH CHOUHARI
, . , , Petitioner
RAKESH CHOUHARI
, . , , Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ^ , .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayalc, APP for State with , , \ W/SL Neetu, P.S. K.N.K. Marg.
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayalc, APP for State with , , \ W/SL Neetu, P.S. K.N.K. Marg.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
20.12.2017 The petitioners have already enjoy interirn protection by virtue of this
Court's order dated 22.09.2017. They have joined investigation and participating in the same.
Mr. Ravi Nayak, the learnedAdditionalPublic Prosecutor states,upon instructions, from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, that the chargesheet is ready and is likely to be filed in the next four weeks.
StatusReport has been handed over. It is taken on record. He further states, upon instructions, that only section 354D of IPC are invoked against the petitioner. He further submits that section 376 has been invoked only against Satinder Pal Rana and not ajgairist the present petitioner. In the
- circumstances, the interim order is confirmed, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioners will regularly appear on each and every date of
. . hearing to be fixed by the Court concerned;
(ii) the petitioners will not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement.
V' threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) ,the petitioner will not leave the country without prior permission of the Courts and the passport, if held by the petitioner, shall be deposited with the Trial Court; and
(iv) the petitioners will duly intimate his new address and telephone number to the SHO/IO of the case (in case of change) under intimation to the Trial Court.
Nothing stated in this order shall be deemed to be an adjudication on the merits of the case.
The applications stand disposed off in the above terms.
DECEMBER 20, 2017 RW I WAZIRI, J
20.12.2017 The petitioners have already enjoy interirn protection by virtue of this
Court's order dated 22.09.2017. They have joined investigation and participating in the same.
Mr. Ravi Nayak, the learnedAdditionalPublic Prosecutor states,upon instructions, from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, that the chargesheet is ready and is likely to be filed in the next four weeks.
StatusReport has been handed over. It is taken on record. He further states, upon instructions, that only section 354D of IPC are invoked against the petitioner. He further submits that section 376 has been invoked only against Satinder Pal Rana and not ajgairist the present petitioner. In the
- circumstances, the interim order is confirmed, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The petitioners will regularly appear on each and every date of
. . hearing to be fixed by the Court concerned;
(ii) the petitioners will not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement.
V' threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) ,the petitioner will not leave the country without prior permission of the Courts and the passport, if held by the petitioner, shall be deposited with the Trial Court; and
(iv) the petitioners will duly intimate his new address and telephone number to the SHO/IO of the case (in case of change) under intimation to the Trial Court.
Nothing stated in this order shall be deemed to be an adjudication on the merits of the case.
The applications stand disposed off in the above terms.
DECEMBER 20, 2017 RW I WAZIRI, J
JUDGMENT