Renu Jain; Pratibha Goyal; Sneh Saini; Manju Bala v. Managing Committee of Maharaja Agarsain Public and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 22 Dec 2017 · 2017:DHC:7998
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) No.11592/2017 & connected matters
2017:DHC:7998
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking mandamus for salary arrears, directing petitioners to first make representations to the respondent and the respondent to consider them as per rules.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) No.11592/2017 & conn.matters Page 1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: December 22, 2017
W.P.(C) 11592/2017
W.P.(C) 11641/2017
W.P.(C) 11668/2017
W.P.(C) 11680/2017
MRS. RENU JAIN MRS. PRATIBHA GOYAL MRS. SNEH SAINI
MRS. MANJU BALA ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate
VERSUS
MANAGING COMMITTEE OF MAHARAJA AGARSAIN PUBLIC AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ayush Singh Rajora, Ms.Niti Jain and
Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocates for R-2 in W.P.(C) Nos.11592/2017, 11641/2017 & 11680/2017
Mr.Devesh Singh, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Neelam Kholiya, Advocate for R-2 in
W.P.(C) No.11668/2017
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER

1. In these petitions, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay the arrears of salary to petitioners in terms of orders of 11th February, 2009 and 1st July, 2016. At the outset, learned counsel for petitioners submits that to seek the relief as sought herein, representation has not 2017:DHC:7998 W.P.(C) No.11592/2017 & conn.matters Page 2 been made. In the peculiar facts, permission to petitioners to make representations to respondent No.1 within two weeks ought to be granted.

2. Despite service of advance notice, none has appeared on behalf of first respondent.

3. Upon hearing, these petitions are disposed of with permission to petitioners to make representations within two weeks and if such representations are received by the first respondent, then it be accordingly dealt with as per the applicable rules and regulations within six weeks and its fate be conveyed to petitioners within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedy, as available in law, if need be. Dasti.

SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE) DECEMBER 22, 2017 mamta