MS. DIBA SAGGAR v. UNION OF INDIA

Delhi High Court · 22 Dec 2017 · 2017:DHC:7997
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) No.11565/2017
2017:DHC:7997
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking promotion on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and directed the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) No.11565/2017 Page 1of 2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: December 22, 2017
W.P.(C) 11565/2017
MS. DIBA SAGGAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rakesh Malhotra, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, Mr.Rishabh Sahu and Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORAL
CM No.47135/2017 Allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(C) No.11565/2017 & CM Nos.47136-37/2017
ORDER

1. In this petition, promotion to the post of Technical Officer (D) is sought by petitioner. There are ancillary prayers too. At the outset, learned counsel for respondent raises jurisdictional issue by pointing out that the relief sought by petitioner has to be adjudicated by Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to a decision of Supreme Court reported as Hari Bansh Lal Vs. Sahodar Prasad Mahto & Ors. (2010) 9 SCC 655 to 2017:DHC:7997 W.P.(C) No.11565/2017 Page 2of 2 submit that writ of quo warranto lies as the promotion granted to the selected candidates is irregular.

2. Upon hearing, I find that the decision of Supreme Court in Hari Bansh Lal (supra) is of no avail for the reason jurisdictional issue was not subject matter of consideration therein. This petition has been filed without impleading the promoted candidates. In view of the above, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition while relegating petitioner to Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi.

3. This petition and the accompanying applications are accordingly disposed of.

SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE) DECEMBER 22, 2017 mamta