Anil Kumar v. Babita Singh

Delhi High Court · 06 Aug 2025 · 2025:DHC:6588
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 2456/2024
2025:DHC:6588
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to prove photocopies of medical documents through examination of a specified witness, granting only one effective opportunity and directing the Trial Court to facilitate the process expeditiously.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 2456/2024 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 06th August, 2025
CM(M) 2456/2024, CM APPL. 25279/2024 & CM APPL. 25280/2024
ANIL KUMAR SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS NEHA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kush and Mr. Nitin Kumar, Advocates
VERSUS
BABITA SINGH DECEASED THROUGH LR SHRI MAHA SINGH .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ashim Vachher, Senior Advocate
WITH
Mr. Vinayak Uniyal and Ms. Saiba M. Rajpal, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. After hearing some arguments, learned Senior Counsel for respondent submits, on instructions, that while reserving their rights and contentions, they would have no objection if the application moved by the petitioner (defendant before the learned Trial Court) on 06.03.2024 seeking to prove photocopies of medical documents of Smt. Sumitra Devi is allowed.

2. He, therefore, submits that respondent would have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

3. In view of the abovesaid statement made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondents and also while keeping in mind the overall facts of the case, the present petition is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

4. The defendant would be at liberty to move appropriate application within ten days from today before the learned Trial Court specifying therein CM(M) 2456/2024 2 as to which particular witness he wants to examine for the purpose of proving medical documents of late Smt. Sumitra Devi.

5. It is, however, made clear that defendant would be entitled to only one effective opportunity in this regard.

6. Learned Trial Court would consider the aforesaid application on the date fixed i.e. 03.09.2025 and would give a very short date for the purposes of examination of the concerned witness in this regard.

7. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.

8. Pending applications also stand disposed of in aforesaid terms.

JUDGE AUGUST 6, 2025/dr/js