Rishabh Suri v. UOI & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 08 Jan 2018 · 2018:DHC:8777
Vibhu Bakhru
W.P.(C) 5267/2017
2018:DHC:8777
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of writ petitions as petitioners had preferred appeals before the Tribunal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

Full Text
Translation output
0.
$-17 to 19 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(a 5267/2017 and CM Nos. 22338-22339/2017
RISHABH SURI Petitioner
Through: MrH.S. Bhullar, MsBhawani Gupta and Ms Sarabjeet Kaur, Advocates.
VERSUS
UOI & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr VinodDiwakar, CGSC withMr Akshay Aggarwal, Advocate for UOI.
MTH
W.P>(e) 5268/2017 and CM Nos. 22340-22341/2017
AASI-INA SURI Petitioner
Through: Mr H.S. Bhullar,Ms Bhawani Gupta
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr AND W.P.(C> 5271/2017 and CM Nos. 22355-22356/2017
SUMEETSURI Petitioner Tlirough: Mr H.S. Bhullar, Ms Bhaw^i Gupta
VERSUS
UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Thi'ough: Mr Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
08.01.2018
ORDER

1. The leai'ned counsel appearing for petitioners seeks to withdraw the present petitions. He states that petitioners have already prefeiTed appeals 2018:DHC:8777 before the Tribunal constituted under the Prevention of Money Launclering Act, 2002.

2. Thepetitions andpending applications aredismissed as withdrawn. VIBHUBAKHRU, J JANUARY 08,2018 RK