Full Text
Translation output
REVIEW PET. 422/2025 in W.P.(C) 10927/2019
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10927/2019
NEM SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gaya Prasad and Mr. Gaurav Sarawat, Advs.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 10927/2019
NEM SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gaya Prasad and Mr. Gaurav Sarawat, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Routa, SPC
Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Routa, SPC
WITH
Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Mr. Rahul Kumar, Ms. Parmita Nath and Ms. Alka Singh, Advs.
Mr. Vikrant N Goyal and Mr. Sumit Goswami, Advs.
Mr. Vikrant N Goyal and Mr. Sumit Goswami, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
ORDER (ORAL)
08.08.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
ORDER (ORAL)
08.08.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
REVIEW PET. 422/2025, CM APPL. 48579/2025 & CM APPL.
48580/2025
48580/2025
JUDGMENT
1. By this review petition, the review petitioner essentially seeks to reargue the issues covered by paras 16 and 17 of our order dated 21 November 2024 under review. It is submitted that, in the absence of actual discharge of duties in the scale of ₹9300-34800/-, the petitioner was not entitled to the relief that he had sought. We have already taken a view contrary to the submissions in paras 16 and 17 of our REVIEW PET. 422/2025 in W.P.(C) 10927/2019 order under review.
2. A review petition cannot be an attempt to reargue a matter which stands decided by the order under challenge.
3. The review petition and accompanying applications are accordingly dismissed.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AMIT SHARMA, J. AUGUST 8, 2025