Full Text
Translation output
/ $--15 to 17-and 25 V . ' . - . ^ i HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 225/2016 &Crl.M.A.No;1229/2016
.ASHUTOSH DUTtMISHRA Petitioner
Through Mr.Santosh Kuniar and Mr.Rajiv : , ' RiMishra, Advs. , )
•
W.P.(CRL) 225/2016 &Crl.M.A.No;1229/2016
.ASHUTOSH DUTtMISHRA Petitioner
Through Mr.Santosh Kuniar and Mr.Rajiv : , ' RiMishra, Advs. , )
•
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent
• Through Mr.NarenderMann, SpLPP., W.P.(GRL) 59.8/2016, GriMA.No.3269/2016 & /
Grl.M.A.No.3270/2016- ' • . , V. ;
KRISHNAMEGH^: : Petitioner •
; :through Mr.R^iv R: Mishra and Ms.Shruti I : : . ; : : Sharmaj Advs,;
' ; • - : :
• Through Mr.NarenderMann, SpLPP., W.P.(GRL) 59.8/2016, GriMA.No.3269/2016 & /
Grl.M.A.No.3270/2016- ' • . , V. ;
KRISHNAMEGH^: : Petitioner •
; :through Mr.R^iv R: Mishra and Ms.Shruti I : : . ; : : Sharmaj Advs,;
' ; • - : :
VERSUS
.CENTRAL BUREAU OFTNyEStlGATlbN , ..... Respondent
Through Mr.Narender Maiuij Spl.PP.
WP^GRL) 933/2016 &CrlM.A.N6.5054/2016 KISHAN LAL AGARWAL : ; {......Petitioner;
Through '
\ ' v • •.,versus \ ^
'CENTRAL BUREAU OF INyESTiGAfION ,....: Respondent. ;
Through ' Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.PP.
2018:DHC:8592
Through Mr.Narender Maiuij Spl.PP.
WP^GRL) 933/2016 &CrlM.A.N6.5054/2016 KISHAN LAL AGARWAL : ; {......Petitioner;
Through '
\ ' v • •.,versus \ ^
'CENTRAL BUREAU OF INyESTiGAfION ,....: Respondent. ;
Through ' Mr.Narender Mann, Spl.PP.
2018:DHC:8592
CRL.REV.P. 776/2015 &Crl.M.A.No.l7512/2015
ASONG SINGSIT ' Petitioner^
Through Mr.Abhay Singh, Ms.Chiral Dugar andMrs.Veena Singh, Advs.
•
ASONG SINGSIT ' Petitioner^
Through Mr.Abhay Singh, Ms.Chiral Dugar andMrs.Veena Singh, Advs.
•
VERSUS
'
STATE THROUGH CBI
Through Mr.Narender Mann, Spi.Pr. .
STATE THROUGH CBI
Through Mr.Narender Mann, Spi.Pr. .
CORAM* 1
HON'BLE MS. JIJSTICKINDERMEET KAUR
0/„ 16.01.2018
After some arguments learned counsels for the petitioners do not press these petitions. This Court has been informed thatthe next
, date fixed before the Trial Court is 29.01.2018. The Trial Court w.ll try to expedite the trial, and in case there is any duphcation of, witnesses the learned public prosecutor in all fairness shall give up
'those witnesses: This is in view ofthe fact that there are more than
100 witnesses cited by the prosecution and only 15 witnesses have been examined till date, •
Petitions disposed ofinthe above tejms.
Trial Court record be returned. / I . f •
INDERMEET KAUR, J JANUARV 16,2018 ndn 2018:DHC:8592
0/„ 16.01.2018
After some arguments learned counsels for the petitioners do not press these petitions. This Court has been informed thatthe next
, date fixed before the Trial Court is 29.01.2018. The Trial Court w.ll try to expedite the trial, and in case there is any duphcation of, witnesses the learned public prosecutor in all fairness shall give up
'those witnesses: This is in view ofthe fact that there are more than
100 witnesses cited by the prosecution and only 15 witnesses have been examined till date, •
Petitions disposed ofinthe above tejms.
Trial Court record be returned. / I . f •
INDERMEET KAUR, J JANUARV 16,2018 ndn 2018:DHC:8592
JUDGMENT