Anita Langan v. Union of India & Anr

Delhi High Court · 05 Jan 2018 · 2018:DHC:8668-DB
S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta
W.P.(CRL)3531/2017
2018:DHC:8668-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions challenging detention orders as infructuous after the Advisory Board favored the petitioners and the detaining authority revoked the orders.

Full Text
Translation output
I
$1, 4, 5 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)3531/2017
ANITA LANGAN Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR Respondents
Through : Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Adv. for DRI Mr. Sanjeev Narul, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI.
W.P.(CRL) 3341/2017
MEENAKSHI GOYAL Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
UOI & ANR. Respondents Mr. Sanjeev Narul, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate for UOI.
W.P.(CRL) 3443/2017
NIDHI BISHNOI Petitioner
Through : Mr. Deepak Choudhary with Mr. Navneet Panwar, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents Mr. Arnit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI.
2018:DHC:8668-DB
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA
05.01.2018 The Advisory Board has on 2Iid Januaiy 2018 rendered its opinion in favour of the Petitioners and a consequential order has been passed by the Respondents on 3rd January 2018 revoking the detention orders issued on 171h October 2017 qua each of the Petitioners. The writ petitions have accordingly been rendered infructuous and are disposed of as such.
S. - JANUARY 05, 2018 SRANi 2018:DHC:8668-DB
JUDGMENT