Sandeep Garg v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

0 Ms.Nitika Khanna,Adv.

VERSUS

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Respondent Through: ■ Ms.Mini Pushkama,Standing Counsel for NDMC with Ms. Anushruti and Ms. Vasundhara Nayyar,Advs.for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO ^ ORDER % 19.01.2018 CM No.2283/2018 in W.P.(0 537/2018 CM No.2312/2018 in W.P.ICI 542/2018 Exemptions allowed subjectto alljust exceptions. Applications stand disposed of., W.P.(0 537/2018 W.P.(C)542/2018 The present petitions have been filed by the petitioners with the following prayers: 2018:DHC:8798 i "It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly bepleased to: i) issue the writ ofcertiorari and/or any other appropriate writ order(s) or direction(s) thereby quashing the impugned order dated 07.12.2017 passed by the respondent, directing the sealing ofthe premises ofthe petitioner, and a) to issue the Writ of Mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ, order(s) or directions(s) thereby directing the respondent NDMC to de-seal the property ofthepetitioners. Any other reliefwhich this Hon'ble Courtdeemsfitandproper in Jl thefacts and circumstances ofthe case and may also be granted ^ infavour ofthepetitioners andagainstthe respondent." A perusal of sealing order dated December 07, 2017 reveals that the impugned orders have been passed in view of the orders of this Court in W.P.(C) 4349/2017 titled Court on its Own Motion V[5]. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. dated September 18, 2017. This aspect is also confirmed by Ms.Mini Pushkama,Standing Counsel for NDMC.In view of \ the fact that the impugned orders are pursuant to orders of the Division -A_ Bench referred to above, it would be appropriate, the petitioners approach the Division Bench. The writ petitions are dismissed with liberty to approach the Division Bench. CM No.2282/2018 in W.P.(C)537/2018 CM No.2311/2018 in W.P.tCI 542/2018 Dismissed as infructuous. r i ii-W V.KAMESWAR RAO,J