Full Text
Translation output
$18 & 19
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ CRL.M.C. 4794/20 17
+ CRL.M.C. 4795/20 17
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GEETA GUPTA Petitioner
Through Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Abhilash Mathur, Mr. Manoj
Pant, Mr. Sumit Misra and Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocates.
* IN THE HIGH COURT
+ CRL.M.C. 4794/20 17
+ CRL.M.C. 4795/20 17
OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GEETA GUPTA Petitioner
Through Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Abhilash Mathur, Mr. Manoj
Pant, Mr. Sumit Misra and Mr. Mayank Sharma, Advocates.
VERSUS
MIS NIVEDAN FIN INVEST LEASE LTD & ANR .....Respondents
Through Mr. Kamal Bahi with Ms. Ambika
Mishra, Advocates for respondent
No.1.
Through Mr. Kamal Bahi with Ms. Ambika
Mishra, Advocates for respondent
No.1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
% 07.02.2018
CRL.M.C. 4794/2017, Crl.M.A. 19102/2017 (stay) & CRL.M.C.
4795/2017 , CrI.M.A.1 9106/2017 (stay)
The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 01.06.2017, whereby, non-bailable warrants qua the petitioner were issued. It is informed that the petitioner has already appeared before the trial Court and submitted to its jurisdiction and has been admitted to bail.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to sit with the respondents and amicably try and resolve the disputes. He submits that the parties may be referred to mediation. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondent is agreeable to sitting across the table, however, such a
2018:DHC:9322
V p. request can always be made to the Trial Court.
In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the petition.
The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Needless to state that the petitioner always has liberty to approach the Trial Court for referring the parties to mediation.
ACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2018
St
2018:DHC:9322
% 07.02.2018
CRL.M.C. 4794/2017, Crl.M.A. 19102/2017 (stay) & CRL.M.C.
4795/2017 , CrI.M.A.1 9106/2017 (stay)
The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 01.06.2017, whereby, non-bailable warrants qua the petitioner were issued. It is informed that the petitioner has already appeared before the trial Court and submitted to its jurisdiction and has been admitted to bail.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to sit with the respondents and amicably try and resolve the disputes. He submits that the parties may be referred to mediation. Learned counsel for the respondent No.1 submits that the respondent is agreeable to sitting across the table, however, such a
2018:DHC:9322
V p. request can always be made to the Trial Court.
In view of the above, no further orders are called for in the petition.
The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Needless to state that the petitioner always has liberty to approach the Trial Court for referring the parties to mediation.
ACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2018
St
2018:DHC:9322
JUDGMENT