Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P. 674/2017 & Crl. M.A. 14825/2017
CRL.REV.P. 674/2017 & Crl. M.A. 14825/2017
CRL.REV.P. 675/2017 & Crl. M. A.14829/2017
VIMLESHVERMA .....Petitioner
Through None
VIMLESHVERMA .....Petitioner
Through None
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &ANR Respondents
Through Mr.Arun Kr. Sharma, APP for State S.I. Anita, P.S. Paschim Vihar
Q^. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
05.02.2018 I. Learned APP for the State points out that by an order dated
24.11.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous case No.4877/2017, the subject
FIR No.160/2017, under Sections 420/468/471/506/323/34 IPC, P.S
Paschim Vihar, has already been quashed on the basis ofasettlement.
The order notes that there is a settlement between the parties dated
03.11.2017.
^ The present petition seeks setting aside of order dated
II.08.2017, whereby the anticipatory bail application ofthe accused was allowed.
Through Mr.Arun Kr. Sharma, APP for State S.I. Anita, P.S. Paschim Vihar
Q^. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
05.02.2018 I. Learned APP for the State points out that by an order dated
24.11.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous case No.4877/2017, the subject
FIR No.160/2017, under Sections 420/468/471/506/323/34 IPC, P.S
Paschim Vihar, has already been quashed on the basis ofasettlement.
The order notes that there is a settlement between the parties dated
03.11.2017.
^ The present petition seeks setting aside of order dated
II.08.2017, whereby the anticipatory bail application ofthe accused was allowed.
ORDER
3. Sii^ce the subject FIR stands quashed, the present petitions have become infructuous. They are accordingly disposed ofas infructuous. + + FEBRUARY 05, 2018 sanj™V SACHDEVA, J 2018:DHC:8596