Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 1198/2015 and CM APPL.29619/2015, 30265/2015
DARA SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Alagh, Advocate with Ms. Anamilca Sharma, Advocate
CM(M) 1198/2015 and CM APPL.29619/2015, 30265/2015
DARA SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Alagh, Advocate with Ms. Anamilca Sharma, Advocate
VERSUS
PRAMOD NIGAM Respondent
Through: Mr. Madan Lai Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate
Through: Mr. Madan Lai Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate
CM(M) 1201/2015 and CM APPL.29649/2015,30264/2015
DARA SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Alagh, Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sharma, Advocate
DARA SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Alagh, Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sharma, Advocate
VERSUS
SUNIL MATHUR Respondent
Through: Mr. Madan Lai Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate
Through: Mr. Madan Lai Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Varun Nischal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
05.02.2018 By the orders impugned in these petitions, leave to defend was granted against the respective respondents on the petitions submitted by the petitioner against each ofthem seeking an order of eviction under Section 14
(l)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for the reasons of bonafide need .
After some hearing, the learned counsel on both sides agree that these petitions may be withdrawn and instead Additional Rent Controller (ARC) be requested for expeditious decisions after trial into the eviction petitions for which suitable period may be specified.
05.02.2018 By the orders impugned in these petitions, leave to defend was granted against the respective respondents on the petitions submitted by the petitioner against each ofthem seeking an order of eviction under Section 14
(l)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for the reasons of bonafide need .
After some hearing, the learned counsel on both sides agree that these petitions may be withdrawn and instead Additional Rent Controller (ARC) be requested for expeditious decisions after trial into the eviction petitions for which suitable period may be specified.
CM(M) 1198/2015 & conn. page 1 of2
2018:DHC:8499 i On the request of counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent fairly agrees that the petitioner may be permitted to place on record additional documents in the nature of Sale Deed in favour of his father in which he claims the title and also the documents connected to the title. The counsel for the petitioner also agrees that in light of the fresh material now being permitted to be brought on record with consent, the respondent also would have the liberty to file additional pleadings in such regard.
The petitions at hand and the applications filed therewith are, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above granted to both sides.
The learned ARC is requested to proceed with the matters expeditiously and make endeavour to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within one year of the next date of hearing already fixed before him.
Petitions and the applications filed therewith are disposed of in above terms.
A
JfeK.GAUB^, J.
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 vk
2018:DHC:8499 i On the request of counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the respondent fairly agrees that the petitioner may be permitted to place on record additional documents in the nature of Sale Deed in favour of his father in which he claims the title and also the documents connected to the title. The counsel for the petitioner also agrees that in light of the fresh material now being permitted to be brought on record with consent, the respondent also would have the liberty to file additional pleadings in such regard.
The petitions at hand and the applications filed therewith are, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above granted to both sides.
The learned ARC is requested to proceed with the matters expeditiously and make endeavour to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within one year of the next date of hearing already fixed before him.
Petitions and the applications filed therewith are disposed of in above terms.
A
JfeK.GAUB^, J.
FEBRUARY 05, 2018 vk
CM(M) 1198/2015 &conn. page2 of2
2018:DHC:8499
2018:DHC:8499
JUDGMENT