Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 814/2018 7 . ^
SUNIL K^UMAR &ORS ..... Petitioners , . , Through; Mr. Anuj Kuhiar Ranjan/Ady. along
' withpetitioners in person.
' ' -
CRL.M.C. 814/2018 7 . ^
SUNIL K^UMAR &ORS ..... Petitioners , . , Through; Mr. Anuj Kuhiar Ranjan/Ady. along
' withpetitioners in person.
' ' -
VERSUS
- " , .
;THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ,& ANR Respondents
Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with ,. , . , ASI Yatender Kumar, P.S. New
AshokNagar. ^ .
; Respondent no.2 in person. , •
. • • AND •
;THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ,& ANR Respondents
Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with ,. , . , ASI Yatender Kumar, P.S. New
AshokNagar. ^ .
; Respondent no.2 in person. , •
. • • AND •
CRL.M.C. 815/2018 ' • - , SHANKAR KUMAR &.ORS ^ Petitioners, 'Through: Mr.; Naman Raj Thakur, Adv. along with petitioners in person. , '
VERSUS
, '
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI &ANR Respondents. , Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with
ASI Yatender Kumar, ,P;S. New
. , . AshokNagar.•
Respondent no.2 in person. '
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI &ANR Respondents. , Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, APP for State with
ASI Yatender Kumar, ,P;S. New
. , . AshokNagar.•
Respondent no.2 in person. '
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
16.02.2018 By these petitions under Section 482 of the, Code' of Criminal
I - ' - '
' • I " \ ^ ' • - ' ' •
Procedure, 1973, it is prayed that following cross FIRs may be quashed :-
(a) J FIR No. 1185/2015 under.Sections 323/341/506/354(A)/34 IPC registered at police station,New Ashok Nagar on the complaint of Ms. Jayeeta Barman (respondent •no.2/complainant in Crl.
. M.C; "814/2018 ahd petitioner no. 2/accused in Crl MC
815/2018. - - • -
. . K (b) fir No. 1186/2015 under Sections 323/354(A)/34 IPC
2018:DHC:8390 registered at police station New Ashok Nagar on the complaint pf Sandeep Kumar (respondent no.2/coniplainant in Crl. M.C.
815/2018 and petitioner no.2/accused in Crl. M.C. 814/2018).
Petitioners/respondent no.2,' in both the petitions, are present in Court arid have been identified by ASI Yatender Kumar of police station New
Ashok Nagar. They submit that they have settled the matter with each other before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Court, Delhi vide two separate proceedings held on 24'^ October, 2017, oftheir own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. They have no objection in case aforesaid FIRs arequashed. ' '
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, in both the petitions, before the Mediation Centre, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served' in keeping the present criminal;proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest ofjustice, both" the aforesaid FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.' > • •
Both the petitions are disposed ofin the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
' , Dasti.
A.K PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 16,2018/ga 2018:DHC:8390
16.02.2018 By these petitions under Section 482 of the, Code' of Criminal
I - ' - '
' • I " \ ^ ' • - ' ' •
Procedure, 1973, it is prayed that following cross FIRs may be quashed :-
(a) J FIR No. 1185/2015 under.Sections 323/341/506/354(A)/34 IPC registered at police station,New Ashok Nagar on the complaint of Ms. Jayeeta Barman (respondent •no.2/complainant in Crl.
. M.C; "814/2018 ahd petitioner no. 2/accused in Crl MC
815/2018. - - • -
. . K (b) fir No. 1186/2015 under Sections 323/354(A)/34 IPC
2018:DHC:8390 registered at police station New Ashok Nagar on the complaint pf Sandeep Kumar (respondent no.2/coniplainant in Crl. M.C.
815/2018 and petitioner no.2/accused in Crl. M.C. 814/2018).
Petitioners/respondent no.2,' in both the petitions, are present in Court arid have been identified by ASI Yatender Kumar of police station New
Ashok Nagar. They submit that they have settled the matter with each other before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Court, Delhi vide two separate proceedings held on 24'^ October, 2017, oftheir own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion. They have no objection in case aforesaid FIRs arequashed. ' '
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no.2, in both the petitions, before the Mediation Centre, I am of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served' in keeping the present criminal;proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest ofjustice, both" the aforesaid FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.' > • •
Both the petitions are disposed ofin the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
' , Dasti.
A.K PATHAK, J.
FEBRUARY 16,2018/ga 2018:DHC:8390
JUDGMENT