Venkata Krishnan v. Bank of Baroda

Delhi High Court · 26 Feb 2018 · 2018:DHC:8657
Indermeet Kaur
W.P.(CRL) 1551/2016
2018:DHC:8657
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of petitions concerning a leased property, dismissed the petitions as withdrawn, and directed handover of the property to the Bank's Receiver upon lease expiry.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 1551/2016
VENKATA KRISHNAN Petitioner
Through Mr.Shalabh Gupta, Advocate.
VERSUS
BANK OF BARODA & ORS Respondents
Through, W.P.(CRL) 1574/2016 HARSH FUTELA Petitioner
Through Mr.Shalabh Gupta, Advocate.
VERSUS
BANK OF BARODA & ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Arun Aggarwal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
26.02.2018 Learned counsel for petitioners under instructions from his clients seeks permission ofthis Court to withdraw this petition.
Permission granted.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Learned counsel for respondent has drawn attention of this
Court to the leased deed allegedly executed between the petitioner and Mr.Deepak Gupta. Itis pointed out that this lease even as per the case of the petitioner expires on 31.3.2018. For this reason the
2018:DHC:8657 > petitioner is withdrawing this petition. On the expiry of the aforenoted lease (31.3.2018) the property will he handed over to the
Receiver ofthe Bank who shall deal with the same in accordance with law.
Petitions disposed of in the above terms.
Order dasti under signatures ofthe Court Master. lA
INDERMEET KAUR, J FEBRUARY 26, 2018 ndn 2018:DHC:8657
JUDGMENT