Nirmal Gupta v. Ram Niwas Gupta

Delhi High Court · 14 Aug 2025 · 2025:DHC:6921
Manoj Jain
CM(M) 1525/2025
2025:DHC:6921
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The High Court set aside the civil imprisonment order against the judgment debtor on his undertaking to pay the decretal amount in installments within a fixed timeframe, with no further extensions allowed.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 1525/2025 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 14th August, 2025
CM(M) 1525/2025& CM APPL. 50147-50148/2025
NIRMAL GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shubham, Advocate.
VERSUS
RAM NIWAS GUPTA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ankur Singhal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Petitioner is judgment debtor before the learned Trial Court.

2. Learned counsel for respondent/decree holder has also joined the proceedings through video -conferencing.

3. The grievance herein is with effect to the order passed by learned Executing Court under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC, whereby the learned Executing Court has directed judgment debtor to be committed to civil imprisonment.

4. According to the learned Counsel for decree holder, the approximate balance decretal amount is Rs. 18,90,000/-.

5. During course of arguments, learned counsel for judgment debtor, on instructions, submitted that the entire balance decretal amount would be cleared within three months from today and the first installments of Rs. 10,00,000/- would be paid to the decree holder, by way of demand draft, before the learned Executing Court on 20.08.2025.

6. He submits that the balance decretal amount, as per the calculation and CM(M) 1525/2025 2 directions of the learned Executing Court, would be cleared within three months from today.

7. Learned counsel for decree holder submits that he has no objection to the proposal coming from the side of judgment debtor but it should be clarified that the judgment debtor would not be entitled to any further opportunity in this regard as on previous occasion also, he did not adhere to his own undertaking and statement.

8. Learned counsel for judgment debtor assures that there would not be any request for extension.

9. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the judgment debtor would make the payment of Rs. 10,00,000/-, as undertaken above, before the learned Executing Court on 20th instant and, thereafter, also the balance decretal amount would be cleared within three months from today.

10. In view of the above, the coercive process whereby he was directed to be taken into custody to undergo civil imprisonment is set aside.

11. It is also made clear that no further extension on any ground, whatsoever, would be entertained from the side of judgment debtor

12. The petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

13. All pending applications stand disposed of in aforesaid terms.

14. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

JUDGE AUGUST 14, 2025/sw/SHS