Rohit v. Union of India

9 AND....{ + W.P.(C) 1885/2017 & CM No.8360/2017 VISHAL CHHIKARA & ORS..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ankur Chhi.bber, Advocate.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA'& ORS..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Kumar and Mr.Nikhil Kumar, Advocates. AND + W.P.(C) 1914/2017 & CM No.8467/2017 0.. DEEPAK..... Petitioner versus Through:.Ms.Anju Gupta and Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates. AND­ + W.P.(C) 1919/2017 & CM No.8498/2017 RAJENDRA GADARI..... Petitioner versus w.P.(C) No. 188412017 & connectedmatters Page 1 0/5 2018:DHC:9191-DB r,..... Respondents 'Through: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Ms.Anju Gupta and Mr.Roshan Lal Goel, Advocates. ' + W.P.(C) 1968/2017 & CM No.8~09/2017 NAVEEN AND ANR \..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for I.. N 1 1(etItlOner 0.., ~.Mohit Naagar, Advocate for metitioner No.2. ' i '

VERSUS

Through::rtIs.Suparna Srivastava, Ms.Sanjna Advocates for R-l to R-3... + UNION OF INDIA & ORS..... Respondents Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with:tvIrJWaize Ali and Mr.Prateek Dh~nda, Advocates. w.P.(C) No.1884120J[7] & connectedmatters Page2of[5] \ II/) ! I + W.P.(C) 1984/2017 & CM No.877S/2017 I I I SANTOSH..... pbtitioner Through: r.Manish Sangwan, Advocati'. versus ': UNION OF INDIA & ORS \...... Respbnden~s Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with I I fIr.Waize Ali and Mr.Prateek \ Dhanda, Advocates;. I AND I + W.P.(C) 1987/2017 & CM No.8784/2017 i REENADEVI..... Petitioner'. Through: f.Manish Sangwan, Advocate i versus:.\: UNION OF INDIA & ORS..... Respondents' Through: Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with: Mr.Waize Ali and Mr.Prateek Dhanda, Advocates. W.P.(C) 2069/2011 & CMNo.907812017 o ANKIT..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohit Naagar, Advocate. J versus· Through: Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Ms.Sanjna Advocates for R-1 to R-3. AND + W.P.(C) 2071/2017 & CM No.9083/2017 AMIT DHANKHAR..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Advocate. w.P. (C) No. J884120J[7] & connected matters Page3of[5] J/

VERSUS

Thr~ugh: Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate. AND + W.P.(C) 2175/2017 SAHIL..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Robin Khokhar, Advocate.

VERSUS

DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE ~. POLICE FORCE CENTRAL RESERVE AND ORS..... Respondents. OJ'" Through: Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC for R-1 to R-4. AND + W.P.(C) 2394/2017 & CM No.10333/2.017 SHAKILA P A T E L:.... Petitioner Through: Mr.Manish Sangwan, Advocate.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC with' Mr.Harsh Pandit and Mr.Rajeev o Ranjan Shahi, Advocates for R-1 to R-4. ' J AND + W.~.(C) 3240/2017 & CMNos.4673~74/2018 TVSHAR SINGH..... Petitioner. Through: Mr.Robin Khokhar, Advocate. "

VERSUS

DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE CENTRAL RESERVE & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Mr.S.Banerji, Advocates for VOL w.P.(C) No. 188412017 & connected matters Page4of[5] )Y r-----­ 2015-16 for the rank: of CT/GD against sports quota" and granted approval to issue offers of appointment to- 91 candidates including the petitioners herein. The aforesaid order dated 12.02.2018 handed, over by learned counsels for the petitioners is taken on record.

2. The present petitions are disposed of by issuing directions to the respondents to issue the offers of appointment to the petitioners, within six weeks from today.

3. The petitions are disposed of. o -HIMA KOHLI, J. J REKH~'J. FEBRUARY 22, 2018 Cst' w.P.(C) No. 1884/2017 & connectedmatters Page 5 0/5 CORAM: HON'BLE MS.