Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: April 04, 2018
SUSHIL HARRISON .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. P.C. Jha, Advocate
Through: Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate for respondent No. 1
Mr. Santosh Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocates for respondent No. 2
Ms. Isha Mital and Mr. Apoorv Kurup, Advocates for respondent No. 3-UGC
JUDGMENT
1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since respondent- College has already made appointment on the post of Library Attendant, therefore, this petition is not pressed. However, a prayer is made that petitioner may be permitted to continue as Office Attendant on contract basis in the respondent-College.
2. Learned counsel for respondent-College submits that petitioner’s employment as Office Attendant on contract basis is not being ended.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that regarding nonpayment of increment, a Representation would be made to the Principal 2018:DHC:2183 W.P.(C) 8296/2016 of respondent-College within six weeks from today. If such a Representation is received by the Principal of respondent-College, then it be effectively dealt with expeditiously.
4. With aforesaid observations, this petition and application are disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE APRIL 04, 2018 s