Shri Ramesh Kaboo v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 11 Apr 2018 · 2018:DHC:2361
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 3526/2018
2018:DHC:2361
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a cryptic order rejecting premature retirement representations, mandating a reasoned speaking order.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 3526/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: April 11, 2018
W.P.(C) 3526/2018 & C.M. 13924-25/2018
SHRI RAMESH KABOO ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. V.K. Raina, Advocate
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1-UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
(ORAL)
ORDER

1. Petitioner was prematurely retired on 5th July, 2017 and his Representation seeking revocation of his premature retirement has been rejected vide impugned order of 29th December, 2017, which is a cryptic order. It gives no reason as to why petitioner’s Representation has been rejected.

2. In view of aforesaid, Director General of Bureau of Indian Standards is called upon to reconsider petitioner’s Representation of 25th July, 2017 and 6th September, 2017 and pass a speaking order thereon within a period of six weeks. The fate of Representations be conveyed to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be. 2018:DHC:2361 W.P.(C) 3526/2018

3. Director General of Bureau of Indian Standards, be forthwith apprised of this order forthwith to ensure its compliance.

4. With aforesaid directions, this petition and applications are disposed of. Dasti.

JUDGE APRIL 11, 2018 r