Naveen Jindal v. State of Not & Anr

Delhi High Court · 23 Apr 2018
Sanjeev Sachdeva
CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & CRL.M.C. 1583/2018
2018:DHC:8446
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under Sections 323/324/341 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.

Full Text
Translation output
$-3&4 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1582/2018
NAVEEN JINDAL Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Sandeep, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT& ANR Respondents
Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma,Addl.PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar
CRL.M.C. 1583/2018
VIKAS CHAUDHARY Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Sandeep, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE OF NOT& ANR Respondents
Through: Ms.Neelam Sharma,Addl.PP for the State with SI Ashish Kumar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
23.04.2018
ORDER

1. The petitioner, in CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 seeks quashing ofFIR No. 1131 of 2015 under Sections 324/341of the IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi and Petitioner in CRL.M.C. 1583/2018 seeks quashing ofFIR No. 1132 of2015 under Sections 323/341 ofthe IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi,based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & 1583/2018 Page 1 2018:DHC:8446

2. In Crl. M.C. 1583/2018, the amended petition has been filed. The same is taken on record.

3. The subjectFlRs are cross FlRs and were registered consequent to a quarrel which took place on account of payment of some commission charges consequentto a sale ofproperty.

4. The parties are neighbours and live in the same locality. With the intervention ofthe respectable members ofthe locality,the parties have settled their dispute and have agreed to live peacefully.

5. Both the parties are present in person in Court today, represented by their counsels and identified by the Investigating Officer. They submit that they have settled their all disputes with the intervention of locals and respectable people of the locality. They further submit that they do not wish to press the criminal complaints againsteach other any further.

6. In view of the fact that the disputes between the parties has been settled, continuation ofcriminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility andjustice in the case demandsthatthe dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor.It would also be expedientto quash the subject FlRs and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

7. In view ofthe above,the petitions are allowed. FIR No. 1131 of 2015 under Sections 324/341ofthe IPG Police Station Bhajanpura, CRL.M.C. 1582/2018 & 1583/2018 Page 2 u Delhi and FIR No. 1132 of2015 under Sections 323/341 ofthe IPC Police Station Bhajanpura, Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are,accordingly quashed.

8. Order Dasti under signatures ofthe Court Master.

APRIL 23,2018 SAN^V SACHDEVA,J Vs'