Hemant Dandona v. Naveen Bareja

Delhi High Court · 25 Apr 2018 · 2018:DHC:9372
Mukta Gupta
CRL.L.P.537/2017
2018:DHC:9372
criminal appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The High Court set aside dismissal of cheque bounce complaints for non-prosecution due to sufficient cause shown including death of complainant and restored the cases for trial.

Full Text
Translation output
/o HIGH COURT OF DELHI ^ Decided on:25th April.2018
CRL.L.P.537/2017
HEMANTDANDONA Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Piyush Chhabra, Ms. Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabb Mishra,Advocates.
VERSUS
NAVEENBAREJA A h ^ ^ Respondent Represeiite^by: Mr.'D.SyKohliandMr.Raghav
V,-.;', Mehdiratta,-Advocates.
- CRL.L.P.538/2017 K'-.
HEMANTDANDONA n —^Petitioner
RepfeseiitM^l^^^h^^ Piyush CHbabra, Ms. i-;-;; I^riybMfeTiwary and Mr.' Saurabb
VerSuSi-A iAA
"•! |'i„ yt
NAVEENBAREJA {' | | y11 Respondent D.S.Kohli and Mr.Raghav
;:r|A'''''5-£^#^#ff^ebdiratta,Advocates.
CRLa^Pg39aOTO- HEMANT DANDONA Petitioner Represented by: ^,|&?Piyusb Cbbabra, Ms. ^ and Mr. Saurabb Misbra,Advocates.
VERSUS
NAVEEN BAREJA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.D.S.Kobli and Mr.Ragbav
Mebdiratta,Advocates.
CRL.L.P.540/2017
HEMANT DANDONA Petitioner .
Represented by: Mr. Piyusb Cbbabra, Ms. CRL.L.P.537/2017and Conn,matters Page1of4
2018:DHC:9372 tf Priyanka Tiwary and Mr. Saurabh Mishra,Advocates.
VERSUS
NAVEENBAREJA Respondent Represented by; Mr.D.S.Kohli and Mr.Raghav
Mehdiratta,Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA.J.
(ORAU
CRL.L.P.537/2017
CRL.L.P.538/2017 f "
CRL.L.P.539/2017 'fe
'
1 .A' \1.: . "
CRL.L.P.540/2017
JUDGMENT

1. After perusing the trial court!rejc^ptd, this Court deems it fit to grant the leave to appeal petition.

2. Leave to appeal petitiotfIsijdiM^edsofl>-"-'x, 'm 111 v: >>, A'!,; l.'RI"'. t'. ^ CRL.A. ^/2018(Registry to numberthe appeal) CRL.A. ^/2018(Registiy^to number.jthe appeal) CRL.A.. 72018(Registiy¥b%umb'erthe appeal) CRL.A. I 72018(Registry to numberthe appeal)

1. Admit.

2. Ashok Dandona had filed four complaint cases no. 996701715, 994701715, 99571715 and 997701715 under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short 'NT Act') alleging that in discharge of liability arising out ofsupply ofraw materials, goods,plastic dana supplied CRL.L.P.537/2017andConn,matters Page2of[4] s fL^ by him to Naveen Bareja,Naveen Bareja issued four chequestotaling to Rs. 15,01,742/-, being cheque bearing no. 995507 dated 25th May,2013 for a sum ofRs.3,02,742/-,cheque no.995511 dated 30th May,2013 for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/-, cheque no. 995512 dated 30th May, 2013 for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- and cheque no. 995513 dated 30th May,2013 for a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- all drawn on ICICI Bank,New Friends Colony Branch,New Delhi. Aforesaid cheques on presentation were returned unpaid vide memos tVi ' ' ' ' dated 30 July, 2013 with remarks 'Funds.Insufficient'. Ashok Dandona issued a legal notice dated 12^ Au§ust,_,=2013 through registered post but Naveen Barejafailed to mak?.the:paymen|/:H^^ the complaints.

3. Aforesaid complaint non prbspcution by the learned Metropolitan Magistrdfe appearance ofthe complainant,''i?: r,"V j learned Metropolitan MagistrqtQ vide'ordeFdated 3 May, 2017 for non B'iilthi.

4. Ashok Dandona passed awdy ^^.pril, 2017. Hemant Dandona was impleaded as the legal h^"D|®^j»3Sg^^shok Dandona vide order of thisCourtdated27^Novemt^^io^S^

5. Itisthecaseoftheappltot^tj^i^feiAshokDandonacould not appear on May,2016 due to inadvertence ofcounsel ofLate Shri Ashok Dandona.Thereafter,on 1i?^vNoye^er,2^6f^ugh the counselfor Late Shri Ashok Dandona appeared, however, by that time, the complaint were already taken up and the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate listed the complaints for 3*^^ May, 2017. However, since Late Shri Ashok Dandona rd i passed away on 27^^ April, 2017, none could appear on his behalf on 3 / May,2017and thus,the complaints were dismissedfornon prosecution.

6. For the documents placed on record,this Court is ofthe opinion that sufficient cause has been shown by the appellant for non-appearance before CRL.L.P.537/2017and Conn,matters /> thelearned TrialCourton 3*^*^ May,2017andthetwo dates priorthereto.

7. The impugned judgments dated 3"* May, 2017 dismissing the complaint cases in default under Section 256 Cr.P.C.are set aside.

8. Appeals are disposed of. Trial CourtRecords be sent back.

9. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 28th May,2018.

10. Order dasti. <r APRIL 25,2018 'vn' (MjjKTA GUPTA) iuuG^ CRL.L.P.537/2017and Conn,matters Page4of[4]