Ashok Kumar Maheshwari v. Director of Education

Delhi High Court · 04 May 2018 · 2018:DHC:2920
Sunil Gaur
WP(C) 4770/2018
2018:DHC:2920
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass a speaking order within four weeks, ensuring compliance with an earlier direction and enabling the petitioner to seek further remedies.

Full Text
Translation output
WP( C ) 4770/2018 Page 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: May 04, 2018
WP(C) 4770/2018 & CM No. 18421/2018
SH. ASHOK KUMAR MAHESHWARI ... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Swastik Singh, Advocate
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Subramanyam & Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate for R-1
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
Compliance of direction issued by Respondent-Director of
Education on 9th February, 2018 was sought by petitioner by making a representation to fourth respondent on 12th February, 2018 (Annexure-P).
According to petitioner’s counsel, there is no response to the aforesaid request (Annexure-P).
In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition and the application with direction to fourth respondent to consider petitioner’s request of 12th February, 2018 (Annexure P) and to pass a speaking order thereon, within a period of four weeks, if the request is not granted and petitioner be accordingly informed within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedy, in accordance with the law.
Fourth respondent be apprised of this order forthwith to ensure its
2018:DHC:2920
WP( C ) 4770/2018 Page 2 compliance.
With the aforesaid direction, this petition and the application are disposed of.
A copy of this order be given dasti to petitioner’s counsel.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 04, 2018 P 2018:DHC:2920
JUDGMENT