Full Text
Translation output
WP(C)5070/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: May 11, 2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: May 11, 2018
WP (C) 5070/2018 & CM APPL. Nos. 19580-81/2018
ANIL SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner
Through: Counsel (appearance not given)
ANIL SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner
Through: Counsel (appearance not given)
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate
Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
Petitioner is the Registrar of National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, New Delhi and his grievance is that his
Representation of 13th April, 2017 (Annexure-A) seeking allowances etc. being part of ‘last drawn pay minus pension’ has not been effectively considered. Impugned order of 28th June, 2017 (Annexure-A) concludes as under :-
“In view of above we may return the file to action in the matter will be taken onlyafter final disposal of the case of Sh. N.P. Kaushik and O.P.
Gupta, which is fixed for hearing on 11.09.2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
The writ petitions filed by N P Kaushik and O P Gupta etc. have been disposed of today vide separate order while permitting them to assail the Delhi Consumer Protection Rules, 1987.
2018:DHC:3140
Petitioner is the Registrar of National Consumer Disputes
Redressal Commission, New Delhi and his grievance is that his
Representation of 13th April, 2017 (Annexure-A) seeking allowances etc. being part of ‘last drawn pay minus pension’ has not been effectively considered. Impugned order of 28th June, 2017 (Annexure-A) concludes as under :-
“In view of above we may return the file to action in the matter will be taken onlyafter final disposal of the case of Sh. N.P. Kaushik and O.P.
Gupta, which is fixed for hearing on 11.09.2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
The writ petitions filed by N P Kaushik and O P Gupta etc. have been disposed of today vide separate order while permitting them to assail the Delhi Consumer Protection Rules, 1987.
2018:DHC:3140
WP(C)5070/2018
In view of the aforesaid, this petition and the applications are disposed of, while calling upon the second respondent to reconsider petitioner’s Representation of 13th April, 2017 (Annexure-A) in light of the applicable rules within a period of six weeks and its fate be known to petitioner within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedy as available in law, if need be.
Second respondent be apprised of this order forthwith to ensure its compliance.
With the aforesaid directions, this petition and the applications are accordingly disposed of.
A copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 11, 2018 p 2018:DHC:3140
In view of the aforesaid, this petition and the applications are disposed of, while calling upon the second respondent to reconsider petitioner’s Representation of 13th April, 2017 (Annexure-A) in light of the applicable rules within a period of six weeks and its fate be known to petitioner within two weeks thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedy as available in law, if need be.
Second respondent be apprised of this order forthwith to ensure its compliance.
With the aforesaid directions, this petition and the applications are accordingly disposed of.
A copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for the parties.
(SUNIL GAUR)
JUDGE
MAY 11, 2018 p 2018:DHC:3140
JUDGMENT