Hindalco Industries Limited v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 02 May 2018 · 2018:DHC:9022
Rajiv Shakdher
W.P.(C)4651/2018 & CM APP No.17951-52/2018
2018:DHC:9022
administrative appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court granted interim stay on the operation of a government communication pending Tribunal adjudication, allowing the petitioner to approach the Tribunal within two weeks and restraining enforcement of adverse decisions temporarily.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date ofDecision:2.5.2018
W.P.(C)4651/2018&CM APP No.17951-52/2018
HINDALCOINDUSTRIES LIMITED Petitioner
Through; Dr. A.M.Singhvi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Prasad, Mr. Sanyam Saxena, Ms. Mukta Dutta, Mr. Rohit Sharma, ^ Mr. Ashish Virmani and Mr. Rohan ^ Roy,Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OFINDIA AND ORS. Respondent
Through: Mr. Nitish Gupta with Mr. Farman All,Advs.for R-1 &2.
Mr.Sambhav Jain,LE/MOC with Mr. Santosh Ray,ASO/MOC.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RA.IIV SHAKDHER.J.(ORAL)
CM APPL.No.17952/2018 I Allowed,subjectto alljustexceptions. w P(r)Nn.46Sl/2018&CM APP No.17951/2018
JUDGMENT

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr.Nitish Guptaappearson advancenoticeforrespondentNo.1&2.

4. It is to be noted that the facts obtaining in the present case are identicaltothe facts obtaining in W.P.(C)No.4655/2018. Counselfor both 2018:DHC:9022 7^ < Y following directions;

(i) The petitioner is given liberty to approachthe Tribunal within two weeksfrom today.

(ii) Pending adjudication by the Tribunal, the operation of the impugnedcommunicationdated26.4.2018shallremainstayed.

(iii) In case the decision rendered by the Tribunal is against the interestofthe petitioner,the said decision willnotbe enforced for a period oftwo weeksthereafter.

(iv) It is made clear that ifthe petitioner does not approach the

6. Pendingapplication shallstandclosed.

17. DastiunderthesignaturesoftheCourtMaste^ \UJu1V/ RAJIV SHAKDHER,J