BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SUNITA & ORS

Delhi High Court · 14 May 2018 · 2018:DHC:3190
J.R. Midha
MAC. APP.1028/2017
2016 SCC OnLine Del 2981
civil appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded to accident victims' claimants while remanding the insurer's claim for recovery rights for further evidence and adjudication.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC. APP.1028/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 14th May, 2018
MAC.APP. 1028/2017 & CM Nos.42873/2017, 42875/2017
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD...... Appellant
Through: Mr. Mohd. Mustafa, Advocate
VERSUS
SUNITA & ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr.S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2.
Mr.Yogesh Chauhan, Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.11,13,732/- is awarded to respondents No.1 and 2.

2. On 01st April, 2014, Shiva, Jitender and Mohit were going on a motorcycle bearing no.UP-13P-1130 and when they reached in front of Babu Mudhi, Kashba Police Station, Aurangabad, District Bulandshahar, U.P. they were hit by a bus bearing no.UP-13D-0786 which came from the wrong side. The accident resulted in death of Shiva and Jitender whereas Mohit 2018:DHC:3190 suffered injuries.

3. The deceased Shiva was aged 17 years at the time of the accident and was a student. The deceased was survived by his parents, who filed the claim petition before the Claims Tribunal.

4. The Claims Tribunal awarded the compensation of Rs.11,13,732/- by applying the principles laid down by this Court in Chetan Malhotra v. Lala Ram, 2016 SCC OnLine Del 2981.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal is on a higher side. It is submitted that appellant is claiming recovery rights against the owner of the offending vehicle on the ground that the cheque issued by the insured towards the insurance premium was dishonoured and the policy was cancelled. The appellant is seeking permission to lead additional evidence to prove the dishonour of the cheque and cancellation of policy.

6. Learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2 submits that the amount awarded by the Claims Tribunal is just, fair and reasonable.

7. Learned counsel for respondents No.3 and 4 submit that the appellant has not led any evidence with respect to their claim of recovery rights.

8. This Court is of the view that the amount awarded by the Claims Tribunal to respondents No.1 and 2 is just, fair and reasonable and is, therefore, upheld.

9. The appellant has deposited Rs.14,09,771/- with the Registrar General of this Court in terms of order dated 08th December, 2017.

10. Respondent No.1, Sunita, is present in Court along with particulars of her savings bank account as well as the savings bank account of her husband, respondent No.2. The particulars of their savings bank accounts are as under: - Respondent No.1,Sunita Devi A/c No.21900265935 with Allahabad Bank, Aurangabad, Distt. Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh – 245401 IFSC Code: ALLA0210137; MICR Code:203010055 Respondent No.2,Veer Singh A/c No.2402001700061364 with Punjab National Bank, Lakhaoti Distt. Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh - 245407 IFSC: PUNB0240200; MICR Code: 203024530

11. The Registrar General is directed to disburse the amount deposited by the appellant to respondents No.1 and 2 by instructing UCO Bank, Delhi High Court Branch as under: -

(i) Rs.12 lakh be kept in 120 FDRs of Rs.10,000/- each in the name of respondent No.1 for the periods 1 month to 120 months respectively, with cumulative interest;

(ii) The balance amount, after keeping Rs.12 lakh in FDRs, be released to respondents No.1 and 2 in equal proportion by transferring the same to their aforesaid savings bank accounts.

12. All the original FDRs shall remain with the UCO Bank. However, the statement containing FDR number, amount, date of maturity and maturity amount shall be furnished by UCO Bank to the respondent No.1.

13. The maturity amounts of the FDRs be released to respondent No.1 in her aforesaid savings bank account with Allahabad Bank, Aurangabad, Distt. Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh.

4,846 characters total

14. No loan or advance or pre-mature discharge shall be permitted without the permission of this Court.

15. Punjab National Bank, Lakhaoti Distt. Bulandshahr Branch and Allahabad Bank, Aurangabad, Distt. Bulandshahr, Branch shall permit respondents No.1 and 2 to withdraw money from their respective savings bank account by means of a withdrawal form.

16. With respect to the appellant’s claim for recovery rights, the appellant is permitted to lead additional evidence before the Claims Tribunal on the issue of recovery rights.

17. The issue of recovery rights is remanded back to the Claims Tribunal. The Claims Tribunal shall permit the appellant to lead additional evidence on the issue of recovery rights. The Claims Tribunal shall thereafter afford an opportunity to respondents No.3 and 4 to lead evidence in rebuttal. The Claims Tribunal shall thereafter adjudicate the appellant’s claim for recovery right after recording the additional evidence.

18. The appellant and respondents No.3 and 4 shall appear before the Claims Tribunal on 10th July, 2018.

19. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. Pending applications are disposed of.

20. The statutory amount be refunded back to the appellant.

21. The record of the Claims Tribunal be returned back forthwith.

22. Copy of this judgment be given dasti to learned counsels for the parties under signature of Court Master. MAY 14, 2018 J.R.MIDHA, J. rsk/dk