Prem Thakran v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 28 May 2018 · 2018:DHC:3541
Sunil Gaur
W.P.(C) 134/2017
2018:DHC:3541
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to submit a representation for re-employment which must be effectively considered and decided upon with a speaking order in compliance with a prior judicial directive.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 134/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: May 28, 2018
W.P.(C) 134/2017
PREM THAKRAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan and Ms. Jatinder Kaur, Advocates
VERSUS
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Advocate for R-1 and 2.
Mr. Anurag Lakhotia, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR O R D E R (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. Petitioner had sought re-employment/extension of her service for a period of two years and extension to petitioner has been declined and in the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 2, it is disclosed that petitioner does not have any National or State level Award. Upon hearing, this Court finds that denial of extension of service to petitioner is justified. However, case of petitioner for re-employment has not been effectively considered and in view of Order of 27th September, 2013, petitioner’s case for re-employment ought to be effectively considered.

2. In light of the aforesaid, this petition is disposed of with permission to petitioner to make a concise Representation to the respondent-School to seek re-employment, in light of the Directorate’s order of 27th September, 2013 within a period of two weeks. If any such 2018:DHC:3541 W.P.(C) 134/2017 Representation is received by respondent-School, it be effectively considered with effect from 1st January, 2017 in light of the applicable Rules and Regulations and a speaking response to the said Representation be given within a period of eight weeks and the fate of the Representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

3. With aforesaid directions, this petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to petitioner’s counsel.

JUDGE MAY 28, 2018 p