Union of India & Anr. v. Jog Mohan Chhabra

Delhi High Court · 31 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:3859
Prathiba M. Singh
RFA 738/2015
2018:DHC:4697
civil other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court corrected clerical errors in a judgment regarding the respondent's name and interest rate terminology, issuing a corrigendum applicable to multiple connected appeals.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RFA 738/2015
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. M. K. Tiwari, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. Saxena R. Mishra, Advocates. (M:9811673689)
VERSUS
JOG MOHAN CHHABRA ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Jag Mohan Chhabra, Respondent in person. (M:9555565777)
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R 31.07.2018
CM APPL. 28631/2018
Name of the Respondent shall be read as Jag Mohan Chhabra instead of Jog Mohan Chhabra in the
JUDGMENT
dated 4th July, 2018 as there was a mistake in the cause title when the Union of India filed the appeal.
Judgement be corrected, and the corrected judgment be uploaded.
It has been brought to the notice of this Court that in the second last para of the judgment, along with the rates of interest i.e. 8% and 12% the words ‘per annum’ are missing. Accordingly, it is directed that rates of interest in the second last para be read as rates of interest ‘8% per annum’ and ‘12% per annum’ respectively.
The above change be also read in all the connected RFAs i.e. RFA
No.168/2017, 178/2017, 186/2016, 213/2016, 214/2016, 219/2016, 224/2016, 229/2016, 237/2016, 272/2016, 310/2016, 311/2016, 377/2015, 379/2015, 596/2015, 597/2015, 598/2015, 733/2015, 734/2015, 739/2015, 2018:DHC:4697
765/2015, 841/2015, 842/2015, 1016/2016 & 1023/2016, which were disposed of on 4th July, 2018. The present order be uploaded as a corrigendum in all the said appeals.
CM is disposed of in the above terms.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
JULY 31, 2018 2018:DHC:4697