Kuldeep & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · 06 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:3943
Sanjeev Sachdeva
CRL.M.C. 3327/2018
2018:DHC:3943
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry and related IPC sections following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 3327/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 06.07.2018
CRL.M.C. 3327/2018, CRL.M.A.12061/2018.
KULDEEP & ORS ..... Petitioners
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)& ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Parmil Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with ASI
Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
06.07.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 350 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/506/354/34 of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Harsh Vihar, New Delhi, based on a settlement. It is contended that the FIR was lodged consequent to a matrimonial discord.

2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes and have amicably dissolved their marriage by 2018:DHC:3943 mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 06.04.2018 has been passed. It is further submitted on behalf of the parties that parties had entered into the settlement before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi on 12.07.2017.

3. As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 4,30,000/- was agreed to be paid to respondent no. 2. The amount of Rs. 4,30,000/- has already been paid to respondent no. 2.

4. Respondent no. 2 who is present in court in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. IO confirms that respondent no. 2 has received the entire sum of Rs. 4,30,000/- from the petitioner. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has settled the dispute with the petitioners and is agreeable to the settlement and does not wish to press the criminal charges against the petitioners any further.

5. In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondent no. 2 emanate out of a matrimonial discord and have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

6. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 350 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/506/354/34 of the IPC read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Harsh Vihar, New Delhi and the consequent proceedings there from are, accordingly quashed.

7. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JULY 06, 2018 ‘rs’