Full Text
Translation output
$-33,50, 51 & 53 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7275/2018 & CM No. 27764/2018
HARI GRAND THROUGH LR'S , ..... Petitioner Througli: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms
Mahima Rathi and Mr Sanjay Baniwal, Advocates.
•Versus
DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD , AND ORS. Respondents
Througli: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, GSGC for , , - R-2.
Ms Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for DUSIB, Ms Swagata
Bhuyan and Ms Shiva Pandey, Advocates for respondent. "
W.P.(C) 7275/2018 & CM No. 27764/2018
HARI GRAND THROUGH LR'S , ..... Petitioner Througli: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms
Mahima Rathi and Mr Sanjay Baniwal, Advocates.
•Versus
DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD , AND ORS. Respondents
Througli: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, GSGC for , , - R-2.
Ms Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for DUSIB, Ms Swagata
Bhuyan and Ms Shiva Pandey, Advocates for respondent. "
WITH
W.P.(C) 7309/2018 & CM No. 27888/2018
PUSHPADEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms
Baniwal, Advocates. •
PUSHPADEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms
Baniwal, Advocates. •
VERSUS
AND ORS. Respondents
Through: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, GGSG for UOI/R-2.
Ms Shefali Vohra, Advocate for R-3.
Bhuyan and Ms Shiva. Pandey, 2018:DHC:8519 Advocates for respondent.
Through: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, GGSG for UOI/R-2.
Ms Shefali Vohra, Advocate for R-3.
Bhuyan and Ms Shiva. Pandey, 2018:DHC:8519 Advocates for respondent.
WITH
W.P.(C) 7310/2018 & CM No. 27889/2018
SANJAY KUMAR Petitioner
SANJAY KUMAR Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: .Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for R-2.
Advocates for respondent.- Md. Irshad with Mr Premsagar Pal and Mr Vikas Saini, Advocates for R-
3/GNCTD.
AND
Advocates for respondent.- Md. Irshad with Mr Premsagar Pal and Mr Vikas Saini, Advocates for R-
3/GNCTD.
AND
W.P.(C) 7312/2018 & CM No. 27892/2018
REEMA Petitioner
REEMA Petitioner
VERSUS
Through: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for R-2.
Counsel for. DUSIB, Ms Swagata Advocates for respondent.
Counsel for. DUSIB, Ms Swagata Advocates for respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
17.07.2018
17.07.2018
ORDER
1. Tlie learned counsel appearing for the parties state that the orders that are impugned in these petitions are identical to the orders considered in W.P.(C) 6539/2018 {Laxman Dass v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.) and other connected matters. They state that the issue involved in the present petition- is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in those matters.
2. For the reasons stated in W.P.(C) 6539/2018 {Laxman Dass v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.) and other connected matters, the present petitions are also dismissed.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J JULY 17, 2018 MK