Tajuddin v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 17 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:8364
A.K. Pathak
CRL.M.C. 5079/2017
2018:DHC:8364
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs registered against parties involved in a minor quarrel after they amicably settled their dispute voluntarily, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would not serve any useful purpose.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 5079/2017 '
TAJUDDIN , .....Petitioner, Through: Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv. along with petitioner in person.
VERSUS
THE STATEGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Respondents
Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with
SI R.S. Pandit, P.S. Preet Vihar.
Mr. Praveen Mishra, Adv. for R-2 , along with R-2 in person.
0- - •• / . ... AND
\efe,'.M.C. 5103/2017 FAUZAN BAKSHI .;... Petitioner
, , Through: Mr. Praveen Mishra, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATEGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR..... Respondents
- Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with
/ SI R.S. Pandit, P.S. Preet Vihar.
Mr. Rohit Nagpal, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
17.07.2018 It is submitted that a quarrel took place between Tajuddin and Fauzan
Bakshi on some trivial issue which ledto registration of following FIRs-
ORDER

1) FIR No. 854/2015 under Sections 394/34 IPG registered at police station Preet Vihar, on the complaint ofFauzan _ Bakshi (respondent no.2 in Crl. M.C.5079/2017 and petitioner in Crl. M.C.5103/2017);

2) FIR No. 855/2015 under Sections 323/452/506/34 IPG" 2018:DHC:8364 registered at police station Preet Vihar on. the complaint of Tajuddin (respondent no.2 in Crl. M.C. 5103/2017 and petitioner in Crl. M.C. 5079/2017). It is submitted that Tajuddin and Fauzan Bakshi have now settled their disputes amicable with the intervention of their common friends, therefore, aforesaid FIRs may be quashed. Tajuddin and Fauzan Bakshi submit thattheyhave settled their disputes oftheirownfree will andwithout any undue force, pressure or coercion, therefore, they are not interested in pursuing their respective FIRs and thesame may be quashed. Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the criminal proceedings pending. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Both the petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposedof as infructuous. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J. JULY 17, 2018 ga,