Full Text
W.P.(C) 6377/2018 & CM No. 24518/2018
Date of Decision: 1st June, 2018 DELHI SIKH GURDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND
ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through : Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. A. K. Mishra, Mr. Harpreet Singh Hora and Mr. Amit Kr. Sharma, Advs.
Through : Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC and Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Adv.for R-
1/UOI Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC- GNCTD with Mr. Abhinav Goyal, Ms. Mahamaya Chatterjee, Advs. with Mr. Vinod Kr. (Section Officer)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG
JUDGMENT
GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
1. This writ petition seeks the following prayers:- “1. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a 2018:DHC:3702-DB writ/order/direction in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction in the similar nature for:declaring the provisions of Section 4(b)(ii) of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971 as ultra vires (to the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971) and unconstitutional to the extent the same creates an unreasonable and undue classification amongst Five Takhats of Sikh Religion and Faith resulting into the undue exclusion of Fifth Takhat Sahib (The Holy Takhat Sri Damdama Sahib, Talwandi Sabo) from Section 4(b)(ii) of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971, or in the alternative, Read down the provisions of Section 4(b)(i) of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971 as including the Fifth Takhat SAhib (The Holy Takhat Sri Damdama Sahib, Talwandi Sabo) also in Section 4(b)(ii) of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971 in addition to the existing Four Akal Takhat, or in the alternative, Direct the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to apply the notification dated 23/04/1999 to section 4(b)(i) of Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1971 also in the similar manner as has been done with respect to Section 43 of the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925.”
2. The petitioner submits that it has made several representations, the last being on 3rd March, 2018 which have not been considered by the respondents. Let the matter be first considered by the respondents and a view taken thereon within three months from today. The decision of the respondents shall be conveyed to the petitioner.
3. This writ petition and application are disposed of in the above terms.
4. It shall be open for the petitioner to avail an appropriate remedy against the consideration by the respondents, in accordance with law.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE S.P. GARG, J JUNE 1, 2018