Full Text
Translation output
\
$-17,21 & 22 . , . • . • ; , ^ , HIGH COURT OF DELHI
, CRL.M.C.'55/2017 ^
. YQGESHKAMATH , • ..... Petitioner '
/ • , ' ' ~ Through: Mr.iA^irudh Singh, Adv. /
' • , ' \ t L / ' "
•
$-17,21 & 22 . , . • . • ; , ^ , HIGH COURT OF DELHI
, CRL.M.C.'55/2017 ^
. YQGESHKAMATH , • ..... Petitioner '
/ • , ' ' ~ Through: Mr.iA^irudh Singh, Adv. /
' • , ' \ t L / ' "
•
VERSUS
• , STATE & ANR , ' .....Respondents
Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for the State.
• . Mr.RajatNavet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
" forR-2. ' .
Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for the State.
• . Mr.RajatNavet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
" forR-2. ' .
CRL.M.C. 65/2017 . .
SUNDER SHYAM DUA, ..... Petitioner ' , Through: Mr.Anirudh Singh, Adv.
• , , - •
SUNDER SHYAM DUA, ..... Petitioner ' , Through: Mr.Anirudh Singh, Adv.
• , , - •
VERSUS
, ; ^ .
STATE & ANR ; , .....Respondents ' , ^ Through: Ms.ManjeetArya, APP for the State.
Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
• ' ^fbrR.2. ' ^
^ + CRL.M.C; 66/2017 ^
NIKHIL PAl^YA ; • ....Petitioner , through: Mr.Anirudh Singh, Adv.
STATE & ANR ; , .....Respondents ' , ^ Through: Ms.ManjeetArya, APP for the State.
Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
• ' ^fbrR.2. ' ^
^ + CRL.M.C; 66/2017 ^
NIKHIL PAl^YA ; • ....Petitioner , through: Mr.Anirudh Singh, Adv.
VERSUS
, ., ' , , : STATE & ANR • ^ ..... Respondent
Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APPXor the State.
Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
•: ; ' ' . •fbrR-2. : ••
Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APPXor the State.
Mr.Rajat Navet with Mr.Kushagra Pandit, Adv.
•: ; ' ' . •fbrR-2. : ••
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK 2018:DHC:8361 r
10.07.2018 . It is submitted that the matter has been compromised between the petitioner and the complainant, i.e. respondent Nd.2. Counsel for respondentNo.2 saysthatthe complainthas already b^nwithdrawn.
This petition has become infhictuous and disposed
JULY 10,2018 Bisht A.K. PATHAK,J.
2018:DHC:8361
10.07.2018 . It is submitted that the matter has been compromised between the petitioner and the complainant, i.e. respondent Nd.2. Counsel for respondentNo.2 saysthatthe complainthas already b^nwithdrawn.
This petition has become infhictuous and disposed
JULY 10,2018 Bisht A.K. PATHAK,J.
2018:DHC:8361
JUDGMENT