Arif Shakeel v. State

Delhi High Court · 20 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:9110
Mukta Gupta
W.P.(CRL) 1239/2018
2018:DHC:9110
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple writ petitions as infructuous after the competent authority granted parole to the petitioners in accordance with parole guidelines.

Full Text
Translation output
i9#,2o#,¥i#22#^24#&25#.v^;. ,/■, / ■
* IN THE HIGH COURT Ojp ,DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 1239/2018 '
GDBHATT; . - Petitioner
: , ' ' '. 'Representedbyr. \Mr.^alilA. Ansari and
! ' - Arif Shakeel, Advocates.
^ versuS' ' ■ , STATE ' ^ Respondents
- , Reprekritedb^^ Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate
; - ' ' for Mr..Ashish Aggarwal, . ' \ . ' • • : Additional Standing Counsel, / , ; .. - ^ ■ / for State with SI Sanjeev, PS
'■ ■, TilakMarg.^
' ' r .■ . , ' , ' , . Mr' Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl.P.P.
, ' '• • '.'" r'fbrpBI.- - , ' '
WT».(CRL),1240/2018
MTINCHAUHAN ' ;.r. .....Petitioner
; .: ) '.• / ^ - Representedby: ' Mx.Khalil A. Ansari andMr.
■ ■ ; , ; ■/. ' ^ Arif Shakeel, Advocates. .
7 ■
VERSUS
; ' THE STATE (feANR.; ' —•• Respondents
, ' ■ , ' Representedby; ,Mr.Piyush Singhal, Advocate ■
■ ' - , . V — ^ . for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, . : - — Additional Standing Counsel i ,,;7' . r .^ r • . , 7 for State with SI Saryeev^ PS
' . ■ ' . , ' ■ Tilak Marg.
, ^ ^ , Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Spl. P.P.
^ " -■ — v.■^.'•7' fbrCBL', -- ' -•
'-7'— ■\V.]P,(CRL):i2;43/2pl8^^ '.7. '
' AJtET SINGH. ;' • ; 7 ' , - ' " : ■ •••:• Petitioner, Representedhy:. I^.Khalil A. Ansari andMr.
■7 , ' . . . ■ ArifShakeel,^ Advocates;
. W.P.(CRL).1239/2018,1246/2618,12h/2018,1245/2018,1250/2018and1252/2018 Page1of3
2018:DHC:9110
VERSUS
m
THE STATE& ANR.
Represented by:
+ W.P.(CRL)1245/2018
NEERAJ KUMAR
VERSUS
+ W.P.(CRL)1250/2018
RAJESHBISHT
VERSUS
Respondents
Ms.Pumima Malik,Advocate for Mr.Avi Singh,Additional
Standing Counselfor State with
SI Sanjeev,PS Tilak Marg.
Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari,Spl.P.P. for CBI.
Petitioner
Mr.Khalil A.Ansari and Mr. ArifShakeel,Advocates.
Ms.Pumima Malik,Advocate for Mr.Avi Singh,Additional
Standing Counselfor State with
SI Sanjeev,PS Tilak Marg. for CBI.
Mr.Khalil A.Ansari and Mr. Mr.Jamal Akhtar,Advocate for Mr.Rahul Mehra,Standing
Counsel for State with SI
Sanjeev,PS Tilak Marg. for CBI. W.P.(CRL)1239/2018,1240/2018,1243/2018,1245/2018,1250/2018and1252/2018 Page2of3
.+ W.P.(CRL)1252/2018
SKJAISWAL
Mr.Khalil A. Ansari and Mr.
VERSUS
THE STATE & ANR. . . ' Respondents
Represented by: Ms.-Pumima Malik,Advocate
' ' for Mr.Avi Singh,Additional
' , Standing Counsel for State with
' . \ , SI Sanjeev,PS Tilak Marg.
" . ' ' Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari,Spl.P.P.
' , forCBI. -
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
% 20.07.2018
ORDER

1. Vide communication dated, 26^^ June, 2018, petitioners except petitioner Chander Mohan Singh,have been granted parole by the competent authority.subject to the condition thatthey would be released one after the other,as per the parole /furlough guidelines. 2., Thus W.P.(Crl.)Nos. 1240/2018,,1243/2018, 1245/2018, 1250/2018 and 1252/2018 are disposed ofas infructuous.

MUKTA GUPTA,J. JULY 20,2018 'vn' W.P.