Vikash @ Krishana v. State

Delhi High Court · 16 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:4229
R. K. Gauba
Bail Appln. 673/2018
2018:DHC:4229
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a robbery case involving knife injuries and positive identification, upholding the Sessions Court's order due to the gravity of offences and sufficient evidence.

Full Text
Translation output
Bail appln. 673/2018 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 16th July, 2018
BAIL APPLN. 673/2018 and Crl. M.A. 5623/2018
VIKASH @ KRISHANA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Satyam Thareja, Mr. Bharat Monga and Ms. Supriya Juneja, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
ORDER (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner was arrested on 09.08.2017 in the course of investigation into FIR no.392/2017 of police station Bhajan Pura involving offences punishable under Sections 393, 394, 398, 34 IPC.

2. By the petition at hand, the petitioner seeks release on bail, his application having been declined by the court of Sessions by order dated 01.11.2017. The police report indicates that there is sufficient evidence available to show that the petitioner was one of the assailants who had intercepted the victim snatching his mobile phone under threat, he having been subjected to knife injuries at the time of such occurrence. The petitioner was positively identified 2018:DHC:4229 Bail appln. 673/2018 during test identification parade. In these circumstances, it cannot be said that the case against the petitioner is unfounded.

3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences involved, no case is made out for release on bail.

4. The bail application and the application filed therewith are dismissed. R.K.GAUBA, J. JULY 16, 2018 yg