C V Venugopal v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Delhi High Court · 27 Jul 2018 · 2018:DHC:8347
R. K. Gauba
CRL.M.C. 3865/2014
2018:DHC:8347
criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions challenging framing of charges with liberty to re-approach if the Supreme Court allows the pending SLP.

Full Text
Translation output
$-11, 12 & 13 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3865/2014
C V VENUGOPAL Petitioner
Through: Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Pulkit Jain & Mr. Vivek Punia, Advocates.
VERSUS
CBI Respondent
Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate
CRL.M.C. 1284/2015
NARAYAN RAO MANJUNATH Petitioner
Through: Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharma, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Pulkit
VERSUS
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent
CRL.M.C. 1044/2016
SAMEER SANDHIR
Through:
VERSUS
CRL.M.C. 3865/2014 & conn.
Petitioner Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharaia, Mr. Rohit Gaur, Mr. Pulkit page 1 of2
2018:DHC:8347 It CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
27.07.2018 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions against the order framing charge seeking liberty to approach the court again inthe event of SLP (Crl.)
No. 5482-83/2017 presently pending before Hon'ble Supreme Court being allowed in his favour.
The petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, granted.
JULY 27, 2018 nk
CRL.M.C. 3865/2014 & conn. page 2 of2
2018:DHC:8347
JUDGMENT